What Do We Risk to SQuEASE by Making Psychiatric Phenomenology Too Efficient?
- PMID: 40159408
- PMCID: PMC12060812
- DOI: 10.1159/000545169
What Do We Risk to SQuEASE by Making Psychiatric Phenomenology Too Efficient?
Keywords: First-person perspective; Neoliberalism; Phenomenology; Scaling; Time.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
References
-
- Møller P, Nelson B, McGorry PD, Mei C, Paul Amminger G, Pan Yuen H, et al. . Psychosis risk: time to look empirically at a first-step economical-pragmatic way to examine anomalous self-experience. Exploring the SQuEASE-11. Schizophr Bull. 2024:sbae149. - PubMed
-
- Stanghellini G, Broome M, Raballo A, Fernandez AV, Fusar-Poli P, Rosfort R, editors. The oxford handbook of phenomenological psychopathology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2018.
-
- Stanghellini G, Aragona M, editors. New York: Springer International Publishing; 2016.An experiential approach to psychopathology.
-
- Henriksen MG, Raballo A, Nordgaard J. Self-disorders and psychopathology: a systematic review. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021;8(11):1001–12. - PubMed
-
- Henriksen MG. On incomprehensibility in schizophrenia. Phenom Cogn Sci. 2011;12(1):105–29.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
