Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2025 Apr 1;131(7):e35815.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.35815.

International multispecialty expert physician preoperative identification of extranodal extension in patients with oropharyngeal cancer using computed tomography: Prospective blinded human inter-observer performance evaluation

Affiliations
Observational Study

International multispecialty expert physician preoperative identification of extranodal extension in patients with oropharyngeal cancer using computed tomography: Prospective blinded human inter-observer performance evaluation

Onur Sahin et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Pathologic extranodal extension (pENE) is a crucial prognostic factor in oropharyngeal cancer (OPC), but determining pENE from imaging has high inter-observer variability. The role of clinician specialty in the accuracy of imaging-detected extranodal extension (iENE) remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to assess the influence of clinician specialty on the accuracy of preoperative iENE detection in human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive OPC using computed tomography (CT) imaging.

Methods: This prospective observational study evaluated pretherapy CT images from 24 HPV-positive OPC patients (30 scans, including duplicates). Thirty-four expert observers (11 radiologists, 12 surgeons, 11 radiation oncologists) assessed iENE and reported radiologic criteria and confidence. Ground-truth pENE status was confirmed pathologically. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and Brier scores were compared across specialties. Logistic regression determined significant predictors of pENE, whereas Fleiss' kappa measured interobserver agreement.

Results: Median accuracy was 0.57 (95% CI, 0.39-0.73), with no specialty showing performance beyond chance (median area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.64). Minor differences were noted: surgeons had lower Brier scores (0.26 vs. 0.33, p < .01) and higher sensitivity (0.69 vs. 0.48) compared to radiologists and oncologists. Predictive signs included indistinct capsular contour and nodal necrosis. Interobserver agreement was weak (κ < 0.6).

Conclusions: Diagnostic performance for iENE on CT in HPV-positive OPC remains poor across specialties, with high variability and low accuracy. These findings highlight the need for automated systems or improved imaging methods to enhance iENE assessments.

Keywords: extranodal extension; observer variability; oropharyngeal cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Statement: Dr. Fuller has received unrelated direct industry grant/in-kind support, honoraria, and travel funding from Elekta AB; honoraria, and travel funding from Philips Medical Systems; and honoraria, and travel funding from Varian/Siemens Healthineers. Dr. Fuller has unrelated licensing/royalties from Kallisio, Inc. Dr. Sandulache is a consultant for, and equity holder in, Femtovox Inc (unrelated to current work).

Update of

References

    1. Huang SH, Chernock R, O’Sullivan B. & Fakhry C. Assessment Criteria and Clinical Implications of Extranodal Extension in Head and Neck Cancer. American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book 265–278 (2021) doi:10.1200/EDBK_320939. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gal TJ, O’Brien KJ, Chen Q. & Huang B. Clinical vs Microscopic Extranodal Extension and Survival in Oropharyngeal Carcinoma in the Human Papillomavirus Era. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 162, 693–701 (2020). - PubMed
    1. Zebolsky AL et al. Risk of Pathologic Extranodal Extension and Other Adverse Features After Transoral Robotic Surgery in Patients With HPV-Positive Oropharynx Cancer. JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery 147, 1080–1088 (2021). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hemmati M. et al. Optimized decision support for selection of transoral robotic surgery or (chemo)radiation therapy based on posttreatment swallowing toxicity. Cancer Med 12, 5088–5098 (2022). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferris RL et al. Phase II Randomized Trial of Transoral Surgery and Low-Dose Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Resectable p16+ Locally Advanced Oropharynx Cancer: An ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group Trial (E3311). J Clin Oncol 40, 138–149 (2022). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms