Advantages of Distal Unlocked Proximal Femoral Nails in the Treatment of Stable Intertrochanteric Fractures in Geriatric Patients: A Single-Center Comparative Randomized Study
- PMID: 40160433
- PMCID: PMC11954384
- DOI: 10.1177/21514593251327910
Advantages of Distal Unlocked Proximal Femoral Nails in the Treatment of Stable Intertrochanteric Fractures in Geriatric Patients: A Single-Center Comparative Randomized Study
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to investigate the effect of omitting a distal locking screw in intramedullary nailing of stable intertrochanteric femur fractures on clinical outcomes.
Methods: Ninety-six patients over 65 years old with stable pertrochanteric fractures (AO/OTA 31-A1 and A2) treated with short/intermediate proximal femoral nails (PFNA-II) were randomly assigned into two groups: Group 1 (distal locked) and Group 2 (distal unlocked). Comparative analyses were conducted on operative time, total fluoroscopy time, blood loss, incision length, complications, and functional outcomes.
Results: The mean operative time was significantly shorter in Group 2 (35.73 ± 7.62 minutes) compared to Group 1 (47.40 ± 9.96 minutes) (P < 0.001). Fluoroscopy time was also shorter in Group 2 (45.92 ± 6.08 seconds) compared to Group 1 (54.02 ± 5.94 seconds) (P < 0.001). Incision length was reduced in Group 2 (9.21 ± 1.41 centimeters) compared to Group 1 (12.96 ± 1.68 centimeters) (P < 0.001). Blood loss was lower in Group 2 (187.50 ± 32.00 milliliters) than in Group 1 (208.65 ± 49.12 milliliters) (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the groups in fracture union time, hospital stay, fracture union weeks, or postoperative blood transfusion rates.
Conclusions: Proximal femoral nailing without distal locking offers shorter operative times, reduced fluoroscopy exposure, and lower blood loss and complications, making it a viable option for treating stable intertrochanteric fractures.
Keywords: complications; distal locking; distal unlocking; intertrochanteric fractures; intramedullary nail.
© The Author(s) 2025.
Conflict of interest statement
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures


References
-
- Li X, Zhang L, Hou Z, et al. Distal locked and unlocked nailing for perthrochanteric fractures--a prospective comparative randomized study. Int Orthop. 2015;39(8):1645-1652. - PubMed
-
- Caiaffa V, Vicenti G, Mori C, et al. Is distal locking with short intramedullary nails necessary in stable pertrochanteric fractures? A prospective, multicentre, randomised study. Injury. 2016;47(Suppl 4):S98-S106. - PubMed
-
- Kane PM, Vopat B, Paller D, Koruprolu S, Born CT. Effect of distal interlock fixation in stable intertrochanteric fractures. Orthopedics. 2013;36(7):e859-864. - PubMed
-
- Zou J, Xu Y, Yang H. A comparison of proximal femoral nail antirotation and dynamic hip screw devices in trochanteric fractures. J Int Med Res. 2009;37(4):1057-1064. - PubMed
-
- Pascarella R, Fantasia R, Maresca A, et al. How evolution of the nailing system improves results and reduces orthopedic complications: more than 2000 cases of trochanteric fractures treated with the gamma nail system. Musculoskelet Surg. 2016;100(1):1-8. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources