Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 2:18:100584.
doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100584. eCollection 2025 Jun.

Interdisciplinary medication reviews of psychiatric patients - A mixed method evaluation

Affiliations

Interdisciplinary medication reviews of psychiatric patients - A mixed method evaluation

Dagmar Abelone Dalin et al. Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. .

Abstract

Background: Patients at psychiatric homes are a vulnerable group with several factors complicating their pharmacological treatment. Psychiatric patients in stable treatment are transferred from specialist care to primary care, which presents new challenges as general practitioners (GPs) may feel that they are not sufficiently trained in prescribing and tapering psychiatric drugs. Medication reviews (MRs) have been seen to improve the appropriateness of pharmacological treatment - especially when performed in interdisciplinary teams.

Objective: Thus, the aim of this study was to examine to which extent it was possible to conduct interdisciplinary MRs at a psychiatric home and with patient involvement. The study was a mixed-method evaluation study that included 11 quantitative MRs analyzed by descriptive analysis and 5 qualitative semi-structured interviews analyzed by thematic coding analysis.

Results: The MR performance formed the basis of an interview study. The patients' GPs and psychiatrist accepted 32 of the 37 (86 %) recommended changes to the current medication. At six months follow-up, 75 % of changes had been implemented. Three main interview themes and seven sub-themes were identified, covering collaboration between healthcare professionals, patient involvement, and the MR method. Conduction of interdisciplinary MRs was affected by e.g. challenges in the collaboration between GP and psychiatrists and patient involvement.

Conclusion: Interdisciplinary MRs for psychiatric patients were seen as beneficial by healthcare professionals and had a high implementation rate of medication changes. In future use of the MR model, the involvement of patients and GPs should be ensured and include a psychiatrist in the MR team.

Keywords: General practice; Interdisciplinary team; Medication review; Pharmacist; Polypharmacy; Psychiatry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The process of the practical medication review.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The flow of inclusion of the medication review.

References

    1. Ayre M.J., Lewis P.J., Keers R.N. Understanding the medication safety challenges for patients with mental illness in primary care: a scoping review. BMC Psychiatry. 2023 June 12;23(1):417. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ayre M.J., Phipps D.L., Keers R.N., Lewis P.J. unDerstandIng the cauSes of mediCation errOrs and adVerse drug evEnts for patients with mental illness in community caRe (DISCOVER): a qualitative study. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2023 December 7:14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ayre M.J., Lewis P.J., Phipps D.L., Morgan K.M., Keers R.N. Towards understanding and improving medication safety for patients with mental illness in primary care: a multimethod study. Health Expect. 2024 June;27(3) e14095. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Peterson C., Gustafsson M. Characterisation of drug-related problems and associated factors at a clinical pharmacist service-Naïve Hospital in Northern Sweden. Drugs - Real World Outcomes. 2017 Jun;4(2):97–107. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gillespie U., Alassaad A., Henrohn D., et al. A comprehensive pharmacist intervention to reduce morbidity in patients 80 years or older: a randomized controlled trial. Arch. Intern. Med. 2009 May 11;169(9):894–900. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources