Reply to comments on "Comparative analysis of LMA Blockbuster® clinical performance: Blind versus Miller laryngoscope-guided insertion in paediatric general anaesthesia - A double-blinded, randomised controlled trial"
- PMID: 40160908
- PMCID: PMC11949404
- DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_1159_24
Reply to comments on "Comparative analysis of LMA Blockbuster® clinical performance: Blind versus Miller laryngoscope-guided insertion in paediatric general anaesthesia - A double-blinded, randomised controlled trial"
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Bihani P, Shivanand, Jaju R, Paliwal N, Janweja S, Vyas A. Comparative analysis of LMA Blockbuster® clinical performance: Blind versus Miller laryngoscope-guided insertion in paediatric general anaesthesia – A double-blinded, randomised controlled trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2024;68:875–81. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Van Zundert AA, Kumar CM, Van Zundert TC. Malpositioning of supraglottic airway devices: Preventive and corrective strategies. Br J Anaesth. 2016;116:579–82. - PubMed
-
- Kumar KR, Soni L, Sinha R, Muthiah T, Patel N, Shende DK, et al. Comparison of Ambu AuraGain and BlockBuster laryngeal mask for controlled ventilation in children undergoing minor surgical procedures under general anesthesia: A prospective randomised controlled study. Paediatr Anaesth. 2023;33:474–80. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources