Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Mar 14:7:1410609.
doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1410609. eCollection 2025.

An integrative review on children's perceived and experienced subjective digital well-being

Halla Björk Holmarsdottir  1 , Idunn Seland  1 , Liudmila Zinoveva  2 , Monica Barbovschi  3 , Alina Bărbuță  4 , Dimitris Parsanoglou  5 , Maria Symeonaki  6
Affiliations
Review

An integrative review on children's perceived and experienced subjective digital well-being

Halla Björk Holmarsdottir et al. Front Digit Health. .

Abstract

This review examines children's perceived and experienced subjective digital well-being by investigating their digital activities, behaviours and online relationships across three domains (Family, Leisure, and Education) presenting children's own perspectives. The included studies are limited to research published between 2011 and 2021 using European samples incorporating children aged 5-17 years. While research on children's digital well-being has expanded over the last two decades, the novelty of this review is that it presents research across all activity domains, representing an ecological approach to child development, one that aims to capture children's own views. The 23 studies identified for the review show, first, an apparent shortage of studies on children's well-being involving digital technologies that incorporate children's own perspectives on their situation. Second, the review shows that these studies relate primarily to well-being outcomes categorised as either social, emotional and cultural outcomes or as cognitive development and educational outcomes. Directions for further research on children's digital well-being are suggested.

Keywords: children's perspectives; digital activities; digital well-being; online activities; subjective well-being.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram for scoping review including searches of databases. Derived from: Page et al. (68).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Burns T, Gottschalk F, editors. Educating 21st Century Children: Emotional Well-Being in the Digital Age, Educational Research and Innovation. Paris: OECD Publishing; (2019). doi: 10.1787/b7f33425-en
    1. Brubaker R. Hyperconnectivity and its Discontents. Cambridge: Polity; (2022).
    1. OECD. Measuring What Matters for Child Well-being and Policies. Paris: OECD Publishing; (2021a). doi: 10.1787/e82fded1-en.
    1. OECD. Children and Young People’s Mental Health in the Digital age: Shaping the Future. Paris: OECD Publishing; (2018). Available online at: www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/Children-and-Young-People-Mental-Health-...
    1. Neuman SB. The displacement effect: assessing the relation between television viewing and Reading performance. Read Res Q. (1988) 23:414–40. 10.2307/747641 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources