Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2025 Mar 27;17(3):103941.
doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.103941.

Risk and management of adverse events in minimally invasive esophagectomy

Affiliations
Editorial

Risk and management of adverse events in minimally invasive esophagectomy

Li-Qun Li et al. World J Gastrointest Surg. .

Abstract

Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has transformed esophageal surgery by reducing morbidity, accelerating recovery, and improving postoperative outcomes compared to traditional open esophagectomy. By utilizing techniques such as laparoscopic, thoracoscopic, and robotic-assisted approaches, MIE minimizes surgical trauma while maintaining oncological thoroughness. However, it also presents unique challenges, including risks of complications such as anastomotic leakage, pulmonary complications, and atrial fibrillation. Zhong et al developed and validated a risk stratification model for predicting surgical adverse events after MIE, enhancing preoperative assessment and patient management. This editorial further examines the advantages of MIE, its comparable oncological and long-term outcomes, as well as the incidence and contributing factors of postoperative complications. Emerging technologies, including machine learning models, intraoperative nerve monitoring, and robotic-assisted surgery, are highlighted as innovative solutions for risk prediction and prevention. Strategies such as enhanced recovery after surgery protocols and multidisciplinary collaboration are emphasized for their critical roles in minimizing complications and optimizing patient outcomes. By addressing these aspects, this editorial provides guidance to surgical teams in maximizing the benefits of MIE while effectively managing its associated risks.

Keywords: Anastomotic leakage; Enhanced recovery after surgery; Minimally invasive esophagectomy; Robotic-assisted surgery; Surgical adverse events.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.

Similar articles

References

    1. Bograd AJ, Molena D. Minimally invasive esophagectomy. Curr Probl Surg. 2021;58:100984. - PMC - PubMed
    1. van der Sluis PC, Schizas D, Liakakos T, van Hillegersberg R. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy. Dig Surg. 2020;37:93–100. - PubMed
    1. Scarton A, Capovilla G, Uzun E, Moletta L, Hadzijusufovic E, Provenzano L, Salvador R, Pierobon ES, Zanchettin G, Tagkalos E, Berlth F, Lang H, Valmasoni M, Grimminger PP. 464. Minimally invasive ivor lewis esophagectomy in the elderly patient: a multicenter retrospective matched-cohort study. Dis Esophagus. 2023;36 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guo D, Liao F, Yang L, Liu B, Chen L. The influence of minimally invasive esophagectomy on wound infection in patients undergoing esophageal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis. Int Wound J. 2024;21:e14598. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Capovilla G, Uzun E, Scarton A, Moletta L, Hadzijusufovic E, Provenzano L, Salvador R, Pierobon ES, Zanchettin G, Tagkalos E, Berlth F, Lang H, Valmasoni M, Grimminger PP. Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy in the elderly patient: a multicenter retrospective matched-cohort study. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1104109. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources