Risk and management of adverse events in minimally invasive esophagectomy
- PMID: 40162399
- PMCID: PMC11948108
- DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.103941
Risk and management of adverse events in minimally invasive esophagectomy
Abstract
Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has transformed esophageal surgery by reducing morbidity, accelerating recovery, and improving postoperative outcomes compared to traditional open esophagectomy. By utilizing techniques such as laparoscopic, thoracoscopic, and robotic-assisted approaches, MIE minimizes surgical trauma while maintaining oncological thoroughness. However, it also presents unique challenges, including risks of complications such as anastomotic leakage, pulmonary complications, and atrial fibrillation. Zhong et al developed and validated a risk stratification model for predicting surgical adverse events after MIE, enhancing preoperative assessment and patient management. This editorial further examines the advantages of MIE, its comparable oncological and long-term outcomes, as well as the incidence and contributing factors of postoperative complications. Emerging technologies, including machine learning models, intraoperative nerve monitoring, and robotic-assisted surgery, are highlighted as innovative solutions for risk prediction and prevention. Strategies such as enhanced recovery after surgery protocols and multidisciplinary collaboration are emphasized for their critical roles in minimizing complications and optimizing patient outcomes. By addressing these aspects, this editorial provides guidance to surgical teams in maximizing the benefits of MIE while effectively managing its associated risks.
Keywords: Anastomotic leakage; Enhanced recovery after surgery; Minimally invasive esophagectomy; Robotic-assisted surgery; Surgical adverse events.
©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Similar articles
-
What is the best surgical approach for esophageal cancer?Innov Surg Sci. 2024 Dec 6;10(1):31-35. doi: 10.1515/iss-2023-0021. eCollection 2025 Mar. Innov Surg Sci. 2024. PMID: 40144782 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The impact of combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgery on pulmonary complications after radical esophagectomy in patients with resectable esophageal cancer.Anticancer Res. 2014 May;34(5):2399-404. Anticancer Res. 2014. PMID: 24778050
-
Outcomes of robotic esophagectomy.J Thorac Dis. 2021 Oct;13(10):6163-6168. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2019-rts-07. J Thorac Dis. 2021. PMID: 34795967 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Jun 8;15(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01182-3. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020. PMID: 32513211 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic-assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: technique and early outcomes.Robot Surg. 2017 Sep 27;4:93-100. doi: 10.2147/RSRR.S99537. eCollection 2017. Robot Surg. 2017. PMID: 30697567 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- van der Sluis PC, Schizas D, Liakakos T, van Hillegersberg R. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy. Dig Surg. 2020;37:93–100. - PubMed
-
- Scarton A, Capovilla G, Uzun E, Moletta L, Hadzijusufovic E, Provenzano L, Salvador R, Pierobon ES, Zanchettin G, Tagkalos E, Berlth F, Lang H, Valmasoni M, Grimminger PP. 464. Minimally invasive ivor lewis esophagectomy in the elderly patient: a multicenter retrospective matched-cohort study. Dis Esophagus. 2023;36 - PMC - PubMed
-
- Capovilla G, Uzun E, Scarton A, Moletta L, Hadzijusufovic E, Provenzano L, Salvador R, Pierobon ES, Zanchettin G, Tagkalos E, Berlth F, Lang H, Valmasoni M, Grimminger PP. Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy in the elderly patient: a multicenter retrospective matched-cohort study. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1104109. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources