Guidelines From the French-Speaking Society of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics for Virtual Crossmatching for Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation and the Use of Wet Crossmatch in the Decision-Making Process
- PMID: 40162484
- DOI: 10.1111/tan.70171
Guidelines From the French-Speaking Society of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics for Virtual Crossmatching for Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation and the Use of Wet Crossmatch in the Decision-Making Process
Abstract
The systematic use of Single Antigen Flow Beads assays and the implementation of high-resolution HLA typing for donors and kidney transplant recipients allow a precise identification of anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies. In France, the availability of detailed molecular biology HLA typing for deceased donors in the national organ allocation software enables anticipation of wet crossmatch results and estimation of the immunological risk for a recipient/donor pair. This key process, named virtual crossmatching, involves a thorough analysis of the recipient's anti-HLA sensitisation records. Its main goal is to reduce cold ischaemia time in order to extend graft survival. In this article, we present the guidelines for virtual crossmatching developed by a working group from the French-speaking Society of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics. The guidelines address several considerations regarding HLA typing, anti-HLA antibody testing, and sensitisation event history, which are required to perform virtual crossmatching. We also propose a decision-making process, which situates prospective or retrospective wet crossmatch depending on virtual crossmatch results. The guidelines specifically emphasise the need for a strong clinical-biological agreement to standardise practices and provide a framework for omission of wet crossmatch for both non-sensitised and sensitised recipients.
Keywords: immunological risk; kidney transplantation; SFHI guidelines; virtual crossmatch; wet crossmatch omission.
© 2025 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
-
- GRADE Working Group, “Grading Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendations,” BMJ 328, no. 7454 (2004): 1490, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490.
-
- G. L. Guidicelli, V. Moalic, R. Lemal, et al., “Recommandations du Groupe Technique SFT‐SFHI Identification des Anticorps Anti‐HLA, Standardisation et Seuil de la Technique Luminex Pour l'Identification des Anticorps Anti‐HLA,” published 2020, https://www.sfhi.eu.
-
- M. Ziemann, B. Suwelack, B. Banas, et al., “Determination of Unacceptable HLA Antigen Mismatches in Kidney Transplant Recipients,” HLA 100, no. 1 (2022): 3–17, https://doi.org/10.1111/tan.14521.
-
- B. C. Eby, R. R. Redfield, T. M. Ellis, G. E. Leverson, A. R. Schenian, and J. S. Odorico, “Virtual HLA Crossmatching as a Means to Safely Expedite Transplantation of Imported Pancreata,” Transplantation 100, no. 5 (2016): 1103–1110, https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000001125.
-
- C. P. Johnson, J. J. Schiller, Y. R. Zhu, et al., “Renal Transplantation With Final Allocation Based on the Virtual Crossmatch,” American Journal of Transplantation 16, no. 5 (2016): 1503–1515, https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.13606.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
