Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Practice Guideline
. 2025 Apr;105(4):e70171.
doi: 10.1111/tan.70171.

Guidelines From the French-Speaking Society of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics for Virtual Crossmatching for Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation and the Use of Wet Crossmatch in the Decision-Making Process

Affiliations
Practice Guideline

Guidelines From the French-Speaking Society of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics for Virtual Crossmatching for Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation and the Use of Wet Crossmatch in the Decision-Making Process

Marine Cargou et al. HLA. 2025 Apr.

Abstract

The systematic use of Single Antigen Flow Beads assays and the implementation of high-resolution HLA typing for donors and kidney transplant recipients allow a precise identification of anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies. In France, the availability of detailed molecular biology HLA typing for deceased donors in the national organ allocation software enables anticipation of wet crossmatch results and estimation of the immunological risk for a recipient/donor pair. This key process, named virtual crossmatching, involves a thorough analysis of the recipient's anti-HLA sensitisation records. Its main goal is to reduce cold ischaemia time in order to extend graft survival. In this article, we present the guidelines for virtual crossmatching developed by a working group from the French-speaking Society of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics. The guidelines address several considerations regarding HLA typing, anti-HLA antibody testing, and sensitisation event history, which are required to perform virtual crossmatching. We also propose a decision-making process, which situates prospective or retrospective wet crossmatch depending on virtual crossmatch results. The guidelines specifically emphasise the need for a strong clinical-biological agreement to standardise practices and provide a framework for omission of wet crossmatch for both non-sensitised and sensitised recipients.

Keywords: immunological risk; kidney transplantation; SFHI guidelines; virtual crossmatch; wet crossmatch omission.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. GRADE Working Group, “Grading Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendations,” BMJ 328, no. 7454 (2004): 1490, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490.
    1. G. L. Guidicelli, V. Moalic, R. Lemal, et al., “Recommandations du Groupe Technique SFT‐SFHI Identification des Anticorps Anti‐HLA, Standardisation et Seuil de la Technique Luminex Pour l'Identification des Anticorps Anti‐HLA,” published 2020, https://www.sfhi.eu.
    1. M. Ziemann, B. Suwelack, B. Banas, et al., “Determination of Unacceptable HLA Antigen Mismatches in Kidney Transplant Recipients,” HLA 100, no. 1 (2022): 3–17, https://doi.org/10.1111/tan.14521.
    1. B. C. Eby, R. R. Redfield, T. M. Ellis, G. E. Leverson, A. R. Schenian, and J. S. Odorico, “Virtual HLA Crossmatching as a Means to Safely Expedite Transplantation of Imported Pancreata,” Transplantation 100, no. 5 (2016): 1103–1110, https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000001125.
    1. C. P. Johnson, J. J. Schiller, Y. R. Zhu, et al., “Renal Transplantation With Final Allocation Based on the Virtual Crossmatch,” American Journal of Transplantation 16, no. 5 (2016): 1503–1515, https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.13606.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources