Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 31;13(5):e0289724.
doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02897-24. Online ahead of print.

Comparative analysis of oral microbiome in molar-incisor-hypomineralization vs healthy age-matched controls

Affiliations

Comparative analysis of oral microbiome in molar-incisor-hypomineralization vs healthy age-matched controls

Marina Jung et al. Microbiol Spectr. .

Abstract

Molar-incisor-hypomineralization (MIH) is one of the most challenging dental diseases in children. While the association of oral microbiomes with caries and periodontitis has been studied thoroughly, limited data on the microbial composition in MIH and its clinical significance exist. This cross-sectional study aimed to compare the supragingival plaque microbiome between children and adolescents affected by MIH and a healthy age-matched control group. Ninety-five patients aged 7-17 years were recruited at the Department of Conservative Dentistry, Heidelberg University Hospital. The final sample included 29 participants with a confirmed diagnosis of MIH, treated preventively and restoratively, and 35 orally healthy controls. Clinical data were obtained, and supragingival plaque samples were collected using OMNIgene ORAL OMR-110 (DNA Genotek Inc.), followed by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. The microbiome composition was analyzed using α-diversity (Shannon index) and evenness (Pielou index), with group differences assessed using permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) and MaAsLin2. The overall microbiome composition showed mostly similarities between both groups (PERMANOVA: R² = 0.019, P-value = 0.287), indicating no major dysbiosis. However, a significant decrease in α-diversity and evenness was observed with an increasing number of MIH-affected teeth. Pronounced positive correlations were found between ASV0055 (Streptococcus spp.), caries experience, and MIH severity. ASV0100 (Mannheimia sp.) increased significantly with the increasing number of MIH-affected teeth, whereas ASV0053 (Bergeyella sp.) decreased with higher caries experience. In summary, the oral microbiome of children and adolescents with MIH exhibits no significant differences from healthy children and adolescents of the same age group. Depending on MIH severity, the presence of early plaque-forming species and cariogenic biofilm may increase, requiring intensive, tailored preventive care and appropriate restorative treatment to achieve microbial homeostasis.

Importance: Molar-incisor-hypomineralization (MIH) represents a significant burden for affected children and adolescents, playing an increasingly important role in pediatric dentistry worldwide. Despite its high global prevalence, data on the microbiome of MIH patients remains limited. This study is the first to compare the oral microbiome composition of MIH patients with a healthy control group, making a significant contribution to pediatric dentistry and microbiology. Our results indicate that the oral microbiome of children with MIH is similar to that of healthy children of the same age. Although this structural anomaly predisposes patients to caries, effective preventive and restorative treatments can help maintain microbial homeostasis. However, MIH-affected children remain high-risk patients, as the disease severity may reduce microbial diversity. Furthermore, the increased abundance of Streptococcus spp. in MIH patients indicates a higher caries susceptibility, emphasizing the need for targeted dental care focusing on plaque control and topical fluoride use.

Keywords: Streptococcus; dental plaque; human microbiome; oral microbiome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Overview of the microbiome structure at the species level in supragingival plaque samples from MIH (n = 29) and control (n = 35) groups and its association with clinical parameters. Shown is a two-way clustered heatmap of the 36 most abundant bacterial species (rows). The dendrograms at the top and left display the hierarchical clustering of samples and bacterial taxa, respectively. Shorter branch heights indicate greater similarity between clusters, revealing an overlap in the microbial structure between MIH and control groups. The color key and relevant clinical parameters (indicated by color codes) are presented on the right, showing caries experience by means of the DMF-T index, the number of MIH-affected teeth (Number_MIH), the plaque index (PCR), and the bleeding index (GBI). Clinical parameters presented in the figure are detailed in Table 1.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Relative abundance of Streptococcus sp. in the MIH and control groups. Bar plots showing the difference in relative abundance (Y-axis) of Streptococcus sp. between the MIH and control group (X-axis).
Fig 3
Fig 3
Correlation-based network visualizing pairwise correlations between specific ASVs, α-diversity index, and clinical parameters. Each edge stands for a considerable (Spearman’s ρ > 0.45or ρ < −0.45) and significant (P < 0.05) correlation. The different colors indicate positive (green) and negative (red) correlations. The size of the edge indicates the ρ-value; the bigger the edge, the stronger the association.
Fig 4
Fig 4
Bacterial diversity. (A) The boxplot of the Shannon index presents the differences in α-diversity between the MIH (n = 29) and control groups (n = 35). (B) α-Diversity based on the Shannon index (Y-axis) in correlation with the number of MIH-affected teeth (Number_MIH; X-axis) assessed for the MIH and control groups (Number_MIH = 0).

References

    1. Weerheijm KL, Jälevik B, Alaluusua S. 2001. Molar-incisor hypomineralisation. Caries Res 35:390–391. doi:10.1159/000047479 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sekundo C, Jung M, Muscholl C, Frese C. 2024. Oral health-related quality of life and survival analysis after preventive and restorative treatment of molar-incisor hypomineralisation. Sci Rep 14:777. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-51223-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Garot E, Rouas P, Somani C, Taylor GD, Wong F, Lygidakis NA. 2022. An update of the aetiological factors involved in molar incisor hypomineralisation (MIH): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 23:23–38. doi:10.1007/s40368-021-00646-x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rodd HD, Graham A, Tajmehr N, Timms L, Hasmun N. 2021. Molar incisor hypomineralisation: current knowledge and practice. Int Dent J 71:285–291. doi:10.1111/idj.12624 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hernandez M, Boj JR, Espasa E. 2016. Do we really know the prevalence of MIH? J Clin Pediatr Dent 40:259–263. doi:10.17796/1053-4628-40.4.259 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources