Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 31:10.14309/ajg.0000000000003455.
doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003455. Online ahead of print.

Association of Components of Metabolic Syndrome and the Progression of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Affiliations

Association of Components of Metabolic Syndrome and the Progression of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Phuc Le et al. Am J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Introduction: The effects of metabolic syndrome (MetS), its individual components, and baseline liver histology, on the rates of progression and regression of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), were evaluated.

Methods: We conducted a post hoc analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort study using the noninterventional registry of the Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network (2002-2022). We included patients aged 18 years or older with biopsy-proven NAFLD. Outcomes included progression/regression of histology defined by changes in NAFLD Activity Score, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, or fibrosis. Crude incidence rates were compared among patients with MetS vs those without using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate effects of MetS and its components on the fibrosis progression/regression.

Results: We included 452 patients; the mean age was 51 years, one-third was male, and 85% was White. The median follow-up was 4.3 (range: 1-15.6) years. At baseline, patients with MetS, large waist circumference, and impaired glucose tolerance/diabetes had worse ballooning and fibrosis scores and a higher prevalence of definite nonalcoholic steatohepatitis than those without. MetS was not associated with fibrosis progression or regression. Impaired glucose tolerance/diabetes was associated with a higher risk of fibrosis progression (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.61; 95% confidence interval: 1.11-2.34) whereas hypertension was associated with a lower risk (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.64; 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.96).

Discussion: In the cohort of patients with NAFLD, MetS was associated with greater histological severity at baseline but was not a risk factor of disease progression or regression. Impaired glucose/diabetes was associated with a higher rate and hypertension with a lower rate of fibrosis progression.

Keywords: disease progression; metabolic syndrome; nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

S.D. is funded by grants NIH R01 GM119174; R01 DK113196; P50 AA024333; R01 AA021890; 3U01AA026976; U01 AA 026976; R56HL141744; U01 DK061732; 5U01 DK062470-17S2; R21 AR 071046 which are independent of the submitted work.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Guarantor of the article: Srinivasan Dasarathy, MD.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Kaplan-Meier curves of progression and regression by metabolic syndrome status. Fibrosis progression was defined as an increase of ≥1 point and regression as a reduction of ≥1 point on fibrosis score between biopsies. NASH progression was defined as the development of either borderline (among patients with no NASH at baseline) or definite NASH (among patients with no or borderline NASH at baseline), and regression as having no or borderline NASH at a follow-up liver biopsy (for patients with definite NASH at baseline) or having no NASH at follow-up (for patients with borderline NASH at baseline). Histological progression was defined as an increase by ≥2 points of NAS with ≥1 of which was increase in ballooning and regression as a decrease by ≥2 NAS points with ≥1 of which was decrease in ballooning and without worsening of fibrosis. NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; NAS, NAFLD Activity Score; NASH, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

References

    1. Riazi K, Azhari H, Charette JH, et al. The prevalence and incidence of NAFLD worldwide: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022;7(9):851–61. - PubMed
    1. Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, et al. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease—Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology 2016;64(1):73–84. - PubMed
    1. En Li Cho E, Ang CZ, Quek J, et al. Global prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut 2023;72(11):2138–48. - PubMed
    1. Quek J, Chan KE, Wong ZY, et al. Global prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in the overweight and obese population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023;8(1):20–30. - PubMed
    1. Younossi ZM, Golabi P, de Avila L, et al. The global epidemiology of NAFLD and NASH in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hepatol 2019;71(4):793–801. - PubMed

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources