Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 1;179(6):666-674.
doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2025.0036.

Evidence-Informed Quality Indicators for Pediatric Trauma Care

Affiliations

Evidence-Informed Quality Indicators for Pediatric Trauma Care

Lynne Moore et al. JAMA Pediatr. .

Abstract

Importance: Despite the unique physiological characteristics and health care needs of pediatric trauma patients, there is a lack of quality indicators (QIs) based on pediatric-specific evidence to support quality improvement in this population.

Objective: To develop a consensus-based set of QIs for acute pediatric trauma care that considers evidence on effectiveness, safety, cost-effectiveness, equity, and caregiver perspectives and is applicable in pediatric and nonpediatric trauma centers.

Design, setting, and participants: A modified Research and Development (RAND)/University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) expert consensus study was conducted consisting of an online survey and a virtual workshop, led by an independent moderator. Panelists represented key areas of pediatric trauma patient management, diverse care settings (from level I pediatric trauma centers to level III referring centers), 5 high-resource countries, and caregivers. Data were analyzed from May to August 2024.

Exposure: Likert-scale ratings of 41 QIs.

Main outcomes and measures: Panelists rated 41 QIs on a 7-point Likert scale according to 4 criteria: importance, supporting evidence, actionability, and measurability. QIs with a global score of 24 of 28 or greater and an importance score of 6 of 7 or greater were considered accepted by consensus.

Results: A total of 65 experts were invited, of whom 59 accepted (91%; 25 over 50 years of age [44.7%]; 34 female [60.7%]), 56 (95%) completed the first round, and 54 (92%) completed both rounds. Twenty-three QIs were selected covering key areas of acute pediatric trauma management (eg, transfer to a pediatric trauma center for neurotrauma or major multisystem trauma, documentation of vital signs, early rehabilitation, nutritional support), the most common types of injuries (eg, hypertonic saline in severe traumatic brain injury, stabilization of femoral shaft fractures, nonoperative management of solid organ injuries), value in care (eg, imaging in children at low risk on a clinical decision rule), patient-centered care (eg, designated support person, caregiver presence), and equity (eg, mental health screening).

Conclusions: These results may be used by trauma quality improvement programs in high-resource countries to select context-specific quality indicators to improve the effectiveness, safety, cost-effectiveness, equity, and patient-centered nature of pediatric trauma care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Zemek reported that his program of research has received financial support through competitively-funded research grants from Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation, Physician Services Incorporated Foundation, CHEO Foundation, Ontario Brain Institute, National Football League, Ontario Ministry of Health, Public Health Agency of Canada, Health Canada, Parachute Canada and Ontario SPOR Support Unit, and Health Resources and Services Administration; receiving support as a tier 1 clinical research chair in pediatric concussion from University of Ottawa; serving on the board of directors for North American Brain Injury Society (NABIS), which is a volunteer (unpaid) role; and serving as scientific director, founding partner, and minority shareholder of 360 Concussion Care (a learning health system and network of interdisciplinary concussion clinics in Ontario) outside the submitted work. Dr Lecky reported receiving advisor fees from the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence UK outside the submitted work. Dr Teague reported receiving a philanthropic grant from the Royal Children's Hospital Foundation, which provides salary support for academic activities as distinct from clinical activities. Dr Archambault reported receiving grants from CIHR during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Child injury. Accessed March 15, 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/pdf/2012-04-vitalsigns.pdf
    1. UNICEF . World report on child injury prevention. Accessed May 13, 2020. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241563574
    1. Moore L, Lavoie A, Bourgeois G, Lapointe J. Donabedian’s structure-process-outcome quality of care model: validation in an integrated trauma system. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78(6):1168-1175. doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000000663 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hornor MA, Hoeft C, Nathens AB. Quality benchmarking in trauma: from the NTDB to TQIP. Curr Trauma Rep. 2018;4:160-169. doi:10.1007/s40719-018-0127-1 - DOI
    1. American College of Surgeons . Trauma quality improvement program. Accessed August 26, 2020. https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/trauma/tqp/center-programs/tqip