Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May;133(5):57027.
doi: 10.1289/EHP14677. Epub 2025 May 29.

Seasonal Average Temperature Differences and CVD Incidence: Results from the US-Based Nurses' Health Study, Nurses' Health Study II, and the Health Professional Follow-Up Study

Affiliations

Seasonal Average Temperature Differences and CVD Incidence: Results from the US-Based Nurses' Health Study, Nurses' Health Study II, and the Health Professional Follow-Up Study

Jochem O Klompmaker et al. Environ Health Perspect. 2025 May.

Abstract

Background: Climate change is one of the greatest health threats facing humanity. Multiple studies have documented the impact of short-term temperature exposure on human health. However, long-term temperature exposures are far less studied.

Objectives: We examined whether exposures to higher or lower summer and winter average temperatures compared to long-term average temperatures were associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence in three US-based cohorts.

Methods: We followed 276,618 participants from the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) (1991-2018), the Nurses' Health Study II (NHSII) (1994-2017), and the Health Professionals' Follow-Up Study (1991-2015). We used data (1986-2018) from PRISM Spatial Climate Datasets (800-×800-m spatial resolution) to calculate differences between the summer (June-August) and winter (December-February) average temperatures and the previous 5-year summer and winter average temperatures at residential addresses of each participant. CVD incidence was defined as first nonfatal or fatal myocardial infarction (MI) or nonfatal or fatal stroke. Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine associations with between average temperatures and CVD incidence. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were pooled using random effect meta-analysis. We also examined associations in the populations <65 and 65+ years of age.

Results: After pooling HRs, we found no association of summer average temperatures higher than the previous 5-year average temperature, with CVD incidence. A winter average temperature lower than the previous 5-year average was associated with CVD incidence (HR=0.95 per 2.7°C increase; 95% CI: 0.89, 1.01). Among persons <65 years of age, we observed increased CVD risks with higher summer average temperatures (pooled HR=1.03 per 1.3°C increase; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.07) and lower winter average temperatures (pooled HR=0.91 per 2.7°C increase; 95% CI: 0.87, 0.95) compared to the previous 5-year average temperature.

Discussion: Exposure to a winter average temperature lower than the previous 5-year average was suggestively associated with an increased CVD risk. Exposure to a summer average temperature higher than the previous 5-year average was associated with CVD incidence in the population <65 years of age but not in the full population. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14677.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1 is a set of six forest plots. On the left, two forest plots are titled cardiovascular disease, plotting summer temperature difference and winter temperature difference, each ranging as F E model and cohort, including Nurses’ Health Study, Nurses’ Health Study 2, and Health Professional Follow-up Study (y-axis) across expressed per interquartile range, ranging from 0.90 to 1.06 in increments of 0.16 and 1.06 to 1.25 in increments of 0.19 and 0.78 to 0.93 in increments of 0.15 and 0.93 to 1.11 in increments of 0.18 (x-axis) for hazard ratio (95 percent confidence intervals). At the center, two forest plots are titled myocardial infarction, plotting summer temperature difference and winter temperature difference, each ranging as F E model and cohort, including Nurses’ Health Study, Nurses’ Health Study 2, and Health Professional Follow-up Study (y-axis) across expressed per interquartile range, ranging from 0.90 to 1.06 in increments of 0.16 and 1.06 to 1.25 in increments of 0.19 and 0.78 to 0.93 in increments of 0.15 and 0.93 to 1.11 in increments of 0.18 (x-axis) for hazard ratio (95 percent confidence intervals). On the right, two forest plots are titled stroke, plotting summer temperature difference and winter temperature difference, each ranging as F E model and cohort, including Nurses’ Health Study, Nurses’ Health Study 2, and Health Professional Follow-up Study (y-axis) across expressed per interquartile range, ranging from 0.90 to 1.06 in increments of 0.16 and 1.06 to 1.25 in increments of 0.19 and 0.78 to 0.93 in increments of 0.15 and 0.93 to 1.11 in increments of 0.18 (x-axis) for hazard ratio (95 percent confidence intervals).
Figure 1.
Forest plots of associations of summer and winter temperature difference with CVD, MI, and stroke incidence in the NHS (n=112,650 women), NHSII (n=116,076 women), and HPFS (n=47,892 men) cohorts. There were 11,468 CVD, 5,933 MI, and 5,535 stroke cases in 30,093,911 person-months in NHS. There were 2,006 CVD, 1,063 MI, and 943 stroke cases in 31,822,076 person-months in NHSII. There were 2,332 CVD, 894 MI, and 1,438 stroke cases in 11,174,144 person-months in HPFS. Associations are expressed per IQR (averaged over all three cohorts) increase. The average IQR was 1.3°C for the summer temperature difference and 2.7°C for the winter temperature difference. Cox proportional hazard models included summer and winter temperature difference compared to the 5-year average. Models were stratified by age in months and adjusted for race, calendar year, marital status, living alone, retirement status, smoking status, pack years, diet, alcohol consumption, family history of MI, BMI, physical activity, nSES, cancer, and comorbidities at baseline. For the NHS and NHSII, we also adjusted for occupation of both of the nurse’s parents when she was 16, educational status of her spouse/partner, menopausal status, postmenopausal hormone use, and night shift work. Associations were pooled with a random effect model. Note: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; CVD, cardiovascular disease; FE, fixed effects; HPFS, Health Professional Follow-up Study; HR, hazard ratio; IQR, interquartile range; MI, myocardial infarction; NHS, Nurses’ Health Study; NHSII, Nurses’ Health Study II; nSES, neighborhood socioeconomic status; RE, random effect.
Figure 2 is a set of six forest plots. On the left, two forest plots are titled cardiovascular disease, plotting summer temperature difference and winter temperature difference, each ranging as F E model and cohort, including Nurses’ Health Study, Nurses’ Health Study 2, and Health Professional Follow-up Study (y-axis) across expressed per interquartile range, ranging from 0.85 to 1.03 in increments of 0.18 and 1.03 to 1.25 in increments of 0.22 and 0.82 to 0.94 in increments of 0.12 and 0.94 to 1.08 in increments of 0.14 (x-axis) for hazard ratio (95 percent confidence intervals). At the center, two forest plots are titled myocardial infarction, plotting summer temperature difference and winter temperature difference, each ranging as F E model and cohort, including Nurses’ Health Study, Nurses’ Health Study 2, and Health Professional Follow-up Study (y-axis) across expressed per interquartile range, ranging from 0.85 to 1.03 in increments of 0.18 and 1.03 to 1.25 in increments of 0.22 and 0.82 to 0.94 in increments of 0.12 and 0.94 to 1.08 in increments of 0.14 (x-axis) for hazard ratio (95 percent confidence intervals). On the right, two forest plots are titled stroke, plotting summer temperature difference and winter temperature difference, each ranging as F E model and cohort, including Nurses’ Health Study, Nurses’ Health Study 2, and Health Professional Follow-up Study (y-axis) across expressed per interquartile range, ranging from 0.85 to 1.03 in increments of 0.18 and 1.03 to 1.25 in increments of 0.22 and 0.82 to 0.94 in increments of 0.12 and 0.94 to 1.08 in increments of 0.14 (x-axis) for hazard ratio (95 percent confidence intervals).
Figure 2.
Forest plots of associations of summer and winter temperature difference with CVD, MI, and stroke incidence in subset populations of NHS, NHSII, and HPFS including participants <65 years of age. There were 1,656 CVD, 964 MI, and 692 stroke cases in 10,323,388 person-months in NHS (n=89,007). There were 1,843 CVD, 979 MI, and 864 stroke cases in 30,434,929 person-months in NHSII (n=116,075). There were 369 CVD, 158 MI, and 211 stroke cases in 4,205,374 person-months in HPFS (n=32,680). Associations are expressed per IQR (averaged over all three cohorts) increase. The average IQR was 1.3°C for the summer temperature difference and 2.7°C for the winter temperature difference. Cox proportional hazard models included summer and winter temperature difference compared to the 5-year average. Models were stratified by age in months and adjusted for race, calendar year, marital status, living alone, retirement status, smoking status, pack years, diet, alcohol consumption, family history of MI, BMI, physical activity, nSES, cancer, and comorbidities at baseline. For the NHS and NHSII, we also adjusted for occupation of both of the nurse’s parents when she was 16, educational status of her spouse/partner, menopausal status, postmenopausal hormone use, and night shift work. Associations were pooled with a random effect model. Note: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; CVD, cardiovascular disease; FE, finite element; HPFS, Health Professional Follow-up Study; HR, hazard ratio; IQR, interquartile range; MI, myocardial infarction; NHS, Nurses’ Health Study; NHSII, Nurses’ Health Study II; nSES, neighborhood socioeconomic status.

References

    1. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2021. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    1. IPCC. 2018. Global Warming of 1.5°C. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.
    1. Chen R, Yin P, Wang L, Liu C, Niu Y, Wang W, et al. . 2018. Association between ambient temperature and mortality risk and burden: time series study in 272 main Chinese cities. BMJ 363:k4306, PMID: 30381293, 10.1136/bmj.k4306. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gasparrini A, Guo Y, Hashizume M, Lavigne E, Zanobetti A, Schwartz J, et al. . 2015. Mortality risk attributable to high and low ambient temperature: a multicountry observational study. Lancet 386(9991):369–375, PMID: 26003380, 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62114-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yu W, Mengersen K, Wang X, Ye X, Guo Y, Pan X, et al. . 2012. Daily average temperature and mortality among the elderly: a meta-analysis and systematic review of epidemiological evidence. Int J Biometeorol 56(4):569–581, PMID: 21975970, 10.1007/s00484-011-0497-3. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources