Psychological distress among community-based mental health professionals in Ghana: prevalence and contributing factors
- PMID: 40164878
- PMCID: PMC11958854
- DOI: 10.1007/s44192-025-00167-9
Psychological distress among community-based mental health professionals in Ghana: prevalence and contributing factors
Abstract
In Ghana, community-based mental health professionals (MHPs) are essential in providing mental health treatments, albeit in difficult circumstances. High workloads, a lack of institutional support, and resource constraints are among the factors in these professions' elevated psychological distress. Using a sequential explanatory mixed methods design, this study investigated the prevalence and contributing factors of psychological distress among mental health professionals (MHPs) working in communities in Ghana. Using the DASS-21 scale, quantitative data were gathered from 300 MHPs, and the results showed that the prevalence of clinically significant levels of psychological distress (from mild to extremely severe) was 41.3% for anxiety, 36% for depression, and 32.7% for stress. Psychological distress was significantly influenced by factors such as marital status and work experience. Qualitative interviews with 25 MHPs revealed more stressors that support the high prevalence rates, including workload and clients' behaviour; resource and infrastructure constraints; stigma and affiliate stigma; and lack of institutional support and isolation. The nature and extent of distress beyond depression, anxiety and stress gathered from MHPs' perspectives were the experience of "intense distress" (acute), "persistent distress" (chronic), and "emotional distress" (a component of burnout). Therefore, systemic adjustments, including better infrastructure, more financing for mental health services, and the creation of MHP-specific support programmes, are needed to address the psychological distress of MHPs in Ghana.
Keywords: Community-based mental health professionals; Contributing factors; Prevalence of distress; Psychological distress.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interest: The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. Ethics approval: This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee for Humanities at the University of Ghana (Date: April 26, 2023/No: ECH 154/22-23). Consent to participate: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
References
-
- Kessler RC, et al. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol Med. 2002;32(6):959–76. 10.1017/S0033291702006074. - PubMed
-
- Pearlin LI, Bierman A. Current issues in the study of stress and health. In: Neshensel CS, Phelan JC, Bierman A, editors. Handbook of the sociology of mental health. Springer; 2013. p. 325–340. 10.1007/978-94-007-4276-5_16.
-
- Bride BE. Prevalence of secondary traumatic stress among social workers. Soc Work. 2007;52(1):63–70. 10.1093/sw/52.1.63. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources