Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 Mar 31;25(1):475.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12524-z.

Improving transitions in care for children and youth with mental health concerns: implementation and evaluation of an emergency department mental health clinical pathway

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Improving transitions in care for children and youth with mental health concerns: implementation and evaluation of an emergency department mental health clinical pathway

Alexandra Tucci et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Emergency departments (EDs) are often the first access point for children and youth seeking mental health (MH) and addiction care. However, many EDs are unprepared to manage large volumes of pediatric MH patients. In addition, the fragmented Canadian MH system is challenged in connecting youth seen in the ED for follow-up community services. A provincial Emergency Department Mental Health Clinical Pathway (EDMHCP) for children and youth presenting to the ED with MH concerns was developed to address these challenges. The objective of the current study was to determine if EDMHCP implementation resulted in: (1) pathway use, (2) more patients discharged with MH recommendations, (3) MH service recommendations that aligned with patients' risk assessments, and (4) changes in service outcomes, including ED length of stay (LOS), revisits, and admissions/transfers.

Methods: We implemented the pathway at four ED sites from 2018 to 2019 using the Theoretical Domains Framework to develop a tailored strategy at each site. We conducted chart reviews retrospectively in 2017-2018 (pre-implementation) and prospectively in 2019-2020 (post-implementation). Non-parametric tests examined differences in service outcomes between the implementation periods.

Results: Pathway use varied widely across sites, ranging from 3.1% at site 4 to 83.0% at the lead site (site 2). More referrals to community MH agencies (p <.001) were made at discharge during post-implementation at the lead site compared to pre-implementation, and mixed results were obtained regarding whether clinicians' risk assessments aligned with MH service recommendations. LOS significantly increased at the lead site (p <.001) and non-lead sites (sites 1, 3, 4; p =.02) between pre- and post-implementation. Revisits and admissions/transfers did not change significantly at any site.

Conclusion: Implementation was partially successful at the lead site, showing high pathway use and greater referrals to community MH agencies. These findings emphasize the complexity of implementing pathways in various ED settings. Successful implementation requires integration into existing workflows.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02590302). Registered on 29 October 2015.

Keywords: Clinical pathway; Emergency department; Implementation; Mental health; Pediatric.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was approved by the Research Ethics Board at the Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario (REB #15/146X). Prior to the implementation of the EDMHCP, ethics approval was also obtained from the Ethics Committees at the Cornwall Community Hospital and the Winchester District Memorial Hospital, as well as the Pembroke Regional Hospital Research Ethics Board. As this study used secondary data from a retrospective chart review, the Research Ethics Board at the Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario determined that obtaining informed consent from all participants not necessary or feasible. The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Emergency department mental health clinical pathway algorithm. Legend: ED: Emergency Department; MH/A: Mental Health/Addictions; Screening tools: C/YPS: Caregiver Perception Survey/Youth Perception Survey; ASQ 5: Ask Suicide-Screening Questions; C-SSRS: Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale; PSC-17: Pediatric Symptom Checklist-17; GAIN-SS: Global Appraisal of Individual Needs--Short Screener; PPO: Pre-Printed Order set; HEADS-ED: Clinician Screening Tool
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Implementation timelines for each site

Similar articles

References

    1. McCabe EM, Lightbody TK, Mummery C, Coloumbe A, GermAnn K, Lent B, Black L, Graham KE, Gross DP, Miciak M. Implementing a clinical pathway for paediatric mental health care in the emergency department. Can J Community Mental Health. 2020;38(4):1–8. 10.7870/CJCMH-2019-015.
    1. Chiu M, Gatov E, Fung K, Kurdyak P, Guttmann A. Deconstructing the rise in mental health-related ED visits among children and youth in Ontario. Can Health Aff (Millwood). 2020;39(10):1728–36. 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00232. - PubMed
    1. Gardner W, Pajer K, Cloutier P, et al. Health outcomes associated with emergency department visits by adolescents for self-harm: a propensity-matched cohort study. CMAJ. 2019;191(44):E1207–16. 10.1503/cmaj.190188. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mental Health and Addictions Program Framework Research Team. Mental Health and Addictions System Performance in Ontario: 2021 Scorecard. Toronto: ICES; 2021. https://www.ices.on.ca/publications/research-reports/mental-health-and-a....
    1. Leon SL, Cloutier P, Polihronis C, Zemek R, Newton AS, Gray C, Cappelli M. Child and adolescent mental health repeat visits to the emergency department: a systematic review. Hosp Pediatr. 2017;7(3):177–86. 10.1542/HPEDS.2016-0120. - PubMed

Associated data

Grants and funding