The comparative study of letibotulinum toxin A and onabotulinum toxin A in treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis
- PMID: 40167830
- DOI: 10.1007/s00403-025-04069-2
The comparative study of letibotulinum toxin A and onabotulinum toxin A in treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis
Abstract
Primary axillary hyperhidrosis (PAH) is a challenging condition characterized by excessive underarm sweating. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved onabotulinum toxin A (OnaBTX-A, Botox®, Allergan Inc, USA) as the only botulinum toxin treatment for severe axillary hyperhidrosis, and it has demonstrated positive results. Recently, the off-label use of letibotulinum toxin A (LetiBTX-A, Hugel®, Hugel Inc, Korea) has risen significantly for cosmetic purposes due to its effectiveness. For the treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis, the authors proposed that LetiBTX-A is at least as effective as OnaBTX-A. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of letibotulinum toxin A (LetiBTX-A) in comparison to onabotulinum toxin A (OnaBTX-A) for treating primary axillary hyperhidrosis (PAH). All participants with a diagnosis of moderate to severe primary axillary hyperhidrosis (Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) score ≥ 2) received random injections of 50 U of LetiBTX-A in one armpit and 50 U of OnaBTX-A in the other site. HDSS score and hyperhidrosis area were measured by using the Minor's iodine starch test. Participant satisfaction was evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months following the injection. Onset of action and adverse events were also assessed. All 30 participants completed the study protocol, with the mean age was 34.44 ± 7.82 years and most of the participants were female. The mean age at onset was 20.47 ± 3.01 years and more than 50% of participants had a HDSS score of 3. There was no statistically significant difference observed in the reduction of HDSS scores, hyperhidrosis area, and participant satisfaction between the axillae treated with LetiBTX-A and those treated with OnaBTX-A at 1, 3 and 6 months after injections. The median onset of action of both LetiBTX-A and OnaBTX-A were 2 ± 1 day (p = 0.317). Procedure-related pain was comparable between 2 formulations (P = 0.876). No serious adverse event was observed. This study concluded that LetiBTX-A and OnaBTX-A demonstrate comparable efficacy and safety profiles in treating primary axillary hyperhidrosis (PAH).
Keywords: Botulinum toxin type A; Hyperhidrosis; Letibotulinum toxin A; Onabotulinum toxin A.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
References
-
- An JS, Won H, Si Han C, Park J, H. S., Seo KK (2015) Comparison of OnabotulinumtoxinA and RimabotulinumtoxinB for the treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis. Dermatol Surg 41(8):960–967. https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000429 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Chang HJ, Hong BY, Lee SJ, Lee S, Park JH, Kwon JY (2017) Efficacy and safety of letibotulinum toxin A for the treatment of dynamic equinus foot deformity in children with cerebral palsy: A randomized controlled trial. Toxins (Basel) 9(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins9080252
-
- Choudhury S, Baker MR, Chatterjee S, Kumar H (2021) Botulinum toxin: an update on Pharmacology and newer products in development. Toxins (Basel) 13(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13010058
-
- Flanagan KH, King R, Glaser DA (2008) Botulinum toxin type a versus topical 20% aluminum chloride for the treatment of moderate to severe primary focal axillary hyperhidrosis. J Drugs Dermatol, 7(3), 221–227. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18380203
-
- Frevert J, Ahn KY, Park MY, Sunga O (2018) Comparison of botulinum neurotoxin type A formulations in Asia. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 11:327–331. https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S160723 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical