Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 1;11(2):e005442.
doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-005442.

Patient-reported outcomes as early warning signs of flare following drug cessation in rheumatoid arthritis

Affiliations

Patient-reported outcomes as early warning signs of flare following drug cessation in rheumatoid arthritis

Leher Gumber et al. RMD Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: Drug withdrawal in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in remission can reduce toxicity, but with the risk of flare which requires close monitoring. We explored the potential of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for flare detection among RA patients in sustained remission after conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) cessation.

Methods: Four PROs (Factors that Limit sustAined Remission in rhEumatoid arthritis (FLARE-RA), EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ5D), Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data-3 (RAPID-3) and RA Flare Questionnaire (RA-FQ)) were captured at baseline and at sequential visits until time-of-flare or end of 6-month follow-up as part of the BIO-FLARE prospective cohort study. Flare was defined as any of (i) Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)-C reactive protein (CRP) ≥3.2 at any visit, (ii) DAS28-CRP≥2.4 on two visits within 2 weeks or (iii) resuming DMARD and/or steroid therapy despite DAS28-CRP<2.4. Cox regression models with time-varying covariates were fitted to evaluate associations between PRO changes and likelihood of flare. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves enabled discriminatory changes in each PRO to be compared as a means of identifying flare.

Results: 58/121 (47.9%) participants (70.1% females, mean age 64.8 years) experienced a flare. A 1-point change in each PRO score was strongly associated with flare development in the multivariate Cox regression model (p<0.001 in each case). ROC curve analysis confirmed that monitoring adverse changes in PROs from baseline offered robust discriminatory utility for identifying flare occurrence. This was most evident for RA-FQ and FLARE-RA (both areas under the curves 0.90, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.96; p=0.001); for example, an RA-FQ increment of ≥5.5 from baseline identified objective flare with positive and negative predictive values of 80% and 91%, respectively.

Conclusions: Our data support the potential value of remote PRO monitoring of RA patients in drug-free remission to identify flare occurrence.

Keywords: Autoimmune Diseases; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Rheumatoid Arthritis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Receiver operating characteristic curves for change in patient-reported outcome scores from baseline to point-of-flare. Area under curve and 95% CI have been presented for each patient-reported outcome. EQ5D Index scores were inverted (negative values rendered positive) for purposes of plot generation only, to allow representation on the same axis. EQ5D, EuroQol-5 Dimensions; FLARE-RA, Factors that Limit sustAined Remission in rhEumatoid arthritis; RA-FQ, Rheumatoid Arthritis Flare Questionnaire; RAPID-3, Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data-3.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Longitudinal trends in patient-reported outcomes for flare (A) and remission (B) groups prior to the last clinical visit. Red lines show the fitted trends by loess regression, grey shading shows 95% CIs. The last clinical visit was defined as the point-of-flare for the flare group and the end of follow-up for the remission group. EQ5D, EuroQol-5 Dimensions; FLARE-RA, Factors that Limit sustAined Remission in rhEumatoid arthritis; RA-FQ, Rheumatoid Arthritis Flare Questionnaire; RAPID3, Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data-3.

References

    1. Smolen JS, Landewé RBM, Bijlsma JWJ, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79:685–99. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216655. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brown P, Pratt AG, Hyrich KL. Therapeutic advances in rheumatoid arthritis. BMJ. 2024;384:e070856. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070856. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fujii T, Murata K, Onizawa H, et al. Management and treatment outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis in the era of biologic and targeted synthetic therapies: evaluation of 10-year data from the KURAMA cohort. Arthritis Res Ther. 2024;26:16. doi: 10.1186/s13075-023-03251-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Haugeberg G, Hansen IJW, Soldal DM, et al. Ten years of change in clinical disease status and treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: results based on standardized monitoring of patients in an ordinary outpatient clinic in southern Norway. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17:219. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0716-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Raheel S, Matteson EL, Crowson CS, et al. Improved flare and remission pattern in rheumatoid arthritis over recent decades: a population-based study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2017;56:2154–61. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex352. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances