Inequalities in Access to Specialist Allergy Services in the United Kingdom: A Report From the BSACI Registry for Immunotherapy (BRIT)
- PMID: 40169378
- PMCID: PMC12127059
- DOI: 10.1111/cea.70034
Inequalities in Access to Specialist Allergy Services in the United Kingdom: A Report From the BSACI Registry for Immunotherapy (BRIT)
Abstract
Background: There is an unmet need for specialist allergy treatment in the United Kingdom. Allergen immunotherapy and treatment with omalizumab for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) are key markers for these services. The British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology (BSACI) Registry for Immunotherapy (BRIT) is a national project to record the real-world effectiveness, safety and access to treatment for aero-allergen, venom and peanut immunotherapy as well as omalizumab for CSU.
Methods: We described participant demographics, the index of multiple deprivation (IMD) and access to treatment from the registry launch. Data for 1835 participants were available for analysis from 63 centres enrolled between 1st October 2018 and 24th August 2023.
Results: 96.5% (1771/1835) were living in England, with only 3.5% (64) being from the devolved nations. 14.4% (251/1748) were in the most affluent IMD decile compared to 4.5% (78/1748) in the most deprived IMD decile. White participants were 1.74 times more likely to be referred directly from primary care compared to people of Asian, black, mixed or other minority ethnic groups. Instead, these groups were referred more frequently from secondary or tertiary hospital services. The median distance travelled from home to the treatment centre was 15.2 miles, with evidence of clustering around specialist centres.
Conclusions: We have described disparities and unwarranted variation in the provision of treatment around the UK. The data suggest that there is limited access to immunotherapy in the devolved nations. Access is also reduced by socioeconomic deprivation. White participants were more likely to receive a direct referral from primary care than those from other ethnic groups whose referral pathways were more complex. Registry data are limited by participant enrolment and may have selection bias. Nevertheless, BRIT has highlighted inequity in access to specialist allergy services in the UK.
Keywords: allergen; allergy; basic immunology; biologics; clinical immunology; food allergy; immunotherapy; immunotherapy and tolerance induction; venom and insect allergy.
© 2025 The Author(s). Clinical & Experimental Allergy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
M.E.‐L. has received advisory board honoraria and speaker fees from Allergy Therapeutics and DBV Technologies. He is supported by Southampton NIHR Biomedical Research Centre. T.D. reports ALK Albelo provided travel and conference registration fees to members of his department (2023). L.M. has previous (2020) speaker fees, Advisory Boards and Commercial Clinical Trial Research Grants from Danone Nutricia and Regeneron unrelated to this work and submission. Other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Allergy: The Unmet Need. A Blueprint for Better Patient Care (London: Royal College of Physicians, 2003), 93, https://www.bsaci.org/wp‐content/uploads/2020/02/allergy_the_unmet_need.pdf.
-
- David F., “The UK's Phobia of Allergen Immunotherapy,” Prescriber 28 (2017): 4.
-
- Walker S. M., Durham S. R., Till S. J., et al., “Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis,” Clinical and Experimental Allergy 41, no. 9 (2011): 1177–1200. - PubMed
-
- Powell R. J., Leech S. C., Till S., et al., “BSACI Guideline for the Management of Chronic Urticaria and Angioedema,” Clinical and Experimental Allergy 45, no. 3 (2015): 547–565. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
