Epidemiological, Genetic, Clinical, and Treatment Differences of Generalized Pustular Psoriasis and Acrodermatitis Continua of Hallopeau Across Ethnicities: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 40169503
- DOI: 10.1007/s40257-025-00937-9
Epidemiological, Genetic, Clinical, and Treatment Differences of Generalized Pustular Psoriasis and Acrodermatitis Continua of Hallopeau Across Ethnicities: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Background: Ethnic differences of the clinicopathological characteristics in many immune-mediated skin diseases have been reported, including psoriasis vulgaris (PV). However, the ethnic differences of pustular psoriasis have been less studied.
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the differences in epidemiology, genetic background, clinical manifestations, treatment patterns and responses among Asian and non-Asian patients with pustular psoriasis, including generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) and acrodermatitis continua of Hallopeau (ACH).
Methods: This systematic review was based on a comprehensive search of Cochrane, PubMed, and Embase databases from earliest available date to 31 December 2024, and all studies reporting on patients with either GPP or ACH irrespective of study design. Studies with study size below five patients or those focusing on quality of life or economic aspects were excluded. In each publication, the ethnic composition, demographics information, disease course and manifestation, as well as genetic mutations, treatment type and response were collected if available.
Results: Of 2187 screened studies, 141 studies were included, with the majority being cohort studies. Compared with other ethnicities, East Asians with GPP carried more null IL36RN mutations, while AP1S3 mutations seemed absent in Asians. Phenotypically, Asians had younger onset age, bimodal age distribution, less family history of PV, and more scalp/nail involvement. In Asians, absence of coexisting PV was associated with severe disease. GPP with PV had shorter pre-pustular duration among Asians than non-Asians. Use of acitretin appeared higher and more effective among East Asians compared with other populations. In ACH, Asians mostly carried homozygous null IL36RN mutations and had younger onset age, more multi-digit involvement, persistent treatment course, and more coexisting GPP than Europeans. Biologics use was less common in Asia in both GPP and ACH than in Europe and the US.
Conclusions: This systematic review underscores notable ethnic differences in genetic profiles, clinical features, and therapeutic responses in GPP and ACH. The diagnosis of GPP and ACH may differ across studies and the true impacts of ethnicities on these differences remain to be confirmed. Nonetheless, the results from this study enhance our understanding of the heterogeneous characteristics of GPP and ACH, highlighting the necessity of incorporating ethnic differences into the diagnosis, genetic testing, and management strategies for patients with GPP and ACH.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Funding: The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work. Conflict of Interest: Francis Li-Tien Hsu has no conflict of interest to disclose. Tsen-Fang Tsai has conducted clinical trials or received honoraria for serving as a consultant for Abbvie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Galderma, GSK, Janssen-Cilag, Leo Pharma, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis International, Pfizer, PharmaEssentia, Sanofi, and UCB Pharma. Tsen-Fang Tsai is an Editorial Board member of the American Journal of Clinical Dermatology. Tsen-Fang Tsai was not involved in the selection of peer reviewers for the manuscript nor any of the subsequent editorial decisions. Ethical Statement: This article is a review of previously published research and does not involve any new studies with human participants or animals conducted by the authors. As such, no ethical approval or informed consent was required. Consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Data Availability: This is a review article and does not present original research data. All data discussed in this article are derived from published studies and can be accessed from the respective original sources. Code availability: Not applicable. Author Contributions: Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by F.L.T. Hsu. The first draft of the manuscript was written by F.L.T. Hsu. T.F. Tsai is responsible for study conception, supervision and critical revision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Similar articles
-
Acrodermatitis continua of Hallopeau and generalised pustular psoriasis: Should they be the same or different entities?Exp Dermatol. 2023 Aug;32(8):1235-1245. doi: 10.1111/exd.14805. Epub 2023 Apr 14. Exp Dermatol. 2023. PMID: 37057764 Review.
-
Clinical and genetic differences between pustular psoriasis subtypes.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Mar;143(3):1021-1026. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.06.038. Epub 2018 Jul 21. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019. PMID: 30036598 Free PMC article.
-
Successful treatment of acrodermatitis continua of Hallopeau coexisting with generalized pustular psoriasis with spesolimab: a case report.Front Immunol. 2024 Feb 23;15:1338285. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1338285. eCollection 2024. Front Immunol. 2024. PMID: 38464535 Free PMC article.
-
Different Clinical Features of Pediatric Generalized Pustular Psoriasis in Patients with or without IL36RN Variants.Dermatology. 2023;239(2):217-226. doi: 10.1159/000528753. Epub 2022 Dec 28. Dermatology. 2023. PMID: 36577391
-
The genetic background of generalized pustular psoriasis: IL36RN mutations and CARD14 gain-of-function variants.J Dermatol Sci. 2014 Jun;74(3):187-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2014.02.006. Epub 2014 Mar 5. J Dermatol Sci. 2014. PMID: 24656634 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical