Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 1;25(1):592.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13835-4.

Sweet beverages and the risk of colorectal cancer: the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study

Marie Hauan  1 , Charlotta Rylander  2 , Guri Skeie  2   3
Affiliations

Sweet beverages and the risk of colorectal cancer: the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study

Marie Hauan et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common type of cancer worldwide, with Norwegian women having the highest incidence rate of colon cancer in 2022. The consumption of sweet beverages is a suggested modifiable risk factor for CRC; however, current evidence is limited and inconclusive.

Objective: To assess the associations between the intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), artificially sweetened beverages (ASBs), and juice and the risk of overall and subsite-specific CRC among Norwegian women.

Methods: In this prospective cohort study, we included 73,921 participants aged 41-61 years at baseline. Information on sweet beverage consumption was collected using self-reported food frequency questionnaires at two time points between 1998 and 2014. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the associations between sweet beverage consumption and the risk of overall CRC, proximal colon cancer, distal colon cancer, and rectal cancer.

Results: During a mean follow-up time of 16.5 years from baseline, 1,187 women were diagnosed with CRC. Compared to no consumption, juice consumption was inversely associated with overall CRC risk (HR≥ 7 glasses/wk = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.67-0.98; p-trend = 0.025), colon cancer (HR≥ 7 glasses/wk = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.58-0.94; p-trend = 0.015) and proximal colon cancer (HR≥ 7 glasses/wk = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.52-0.99; p-trend = 0.065) after adjusting for age, education, and diabetes status at baseline. No associations were observed between juice consumption and distal colon cancer or rectal cancer risk, or between the intake of SSBs or ASBs and CRC.

Conclusion: We observed no substantial association between the intake of SSBs or ASBs and the risk of CRC or cancer in colorectal subsites in our cohort of Norwegian women. Conversely, our results indicate that juice consumption is associated with a reduced risk of CRC, particularly in the colon. These results warrant further investigation in larger cohorts with power to detect possible differences in cancer risk across colorectal subsites, especially as patterns of sweet beverage consumption are changing.

Keywords: Artificially sweetened beverages; Colorectal cancer risk; Colorectal neoplasms; Diet; Female; Fruit juices; Prospective studies; Repeated measures; Sugar-sweetened beverages; The NOWAC study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. The study has used data from the Cancer Registry of Norway. The interpretation and reporting of these data are the sole responsibility of the authors, and no endorsement by the Cancer Registry of Norway is intended nor should be inferred. Where authors are identified as personnel of the International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization, the authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this article and they do not necessarily represent the decisions, policy or views of the International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The NOWAC study was approved by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics (REK) and the Norwegian Data Protection Authority. Additionally, this study has an approved Data Protection Impact Assessment (no. 537703) and was approved by REK (no. 778138). Participants provided informed consent to participate and to link their data to the Cancer Registry of Norway and the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry. Data were processed on the basis of public interest. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: G.S. is a member of the National Nutrition Council in Norway. M.H. and C.R. declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of participants included in analyses of colorectal cancer risk
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Cancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health. Cancer in Norway 2023 - Cancer incidence, mortality, survival and prevalence in Norway. Oslo: Cancer Registry of Norway. 2024. Available from: https://www.kreftregisteret.no/en/General/Publications/Cancer-in-Norway/
    1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(3):229–63. 10.3322/caac.21834. - PubMed
    1. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Continuous Update Project Expert Report 2018. Diet, nutrition, physical activity and colorectal cancer. 2018. Available from: http://dietandcancerreport.org
    1. Murphy N, Moreno V, Hughes DJ, Vodicka L, Vodicka P, Aglago EK, et al. Lifestyle and dietary environmental factors in colorectal cancer susceptibility. Mol Aspects Med. 2019;69:2–9. 10.1016/j.mam.2019.06.005. - PubMed
    1. Keum N, Giovannucci E. Global burden of colorectal cancer: emerging trends, risk factors and prevention strategies. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;16(12):713–32. 10.1038/s41575-019-0189-8. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources