Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Sep;15(7):3395-3404.
doi: 10.1177/21925682251328620. Epub 2025 Apr 2.

Pelvic vs Lumbar Fusion in Neuromuscular Scoliosis - A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Pelvic vs Lumbar Fusion in Neuromuscular Scoliosis - A Systematic Review

Venla Soini et al. Global Spine J. 2025 Sep.

Abstract

Study DesignSystematic literature review.ObjectivesPosterior spinal fusion is the golden standard in the treatment of neuromuscular scoliosis. There are different views on whether pelvic fusion is necessary.MethodsA systematic literature review according to PRISMA guidelines was performed. A total of 628 articles were screened. Original articles of neuromuscular scoliosis patients with reference to posterior spinal fusion in the population of ≤20 years of age were included. Operative technique with lumbar pedicle screws was required. Case reports, articles with missing data on pelvic parameters or with a postoperative follow-up of less than 2 years were excluded. A final of 29 original articles were included in the review.ResultsA total of 1611 patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion for neuromuscular scoliosis were included in the analysis with a mean age of 14.0 ± 1.0 years and a mean number of 15.5 ± 0.8 levels fused. Spinal fusion was extended to the pelvis in 1222 cases, while in 389 patients had fusion limited to the lumbar spine. The percentage of main curve correction was slightly higher in pelvic fusion patients 63 ± 10% compared to 58 ± 9% in lumbar fusion group, P < 0.001. Pelvic obliquity correction was superior in the pelvic fusion group, 58% compared to 42% in the spinal fusion group, P < 0.001. Operative time, complication rate and perioperative bleeding were greater in the pelvic fusion group.ConclusionsPelvic fusion in posterior spinal fusion for neuromuscular scoliosis results in small but statistically significant differences in curve correction and pelvic obliquity but increases the risk for perioperative bleeding and other complications. The impact on quality of life should be addressed in future research.

Keywords: adolescent; neuromuscular scoliosis; pediatric; pelvic fusion; spinal fusion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for new systematic reviews which included searches of databases and registers only.

Similar articles

References

    1. Roberts SB, Tsirikos AI. Factors influencing the evaluation and management of neuromuscular scoliosis: a review of the literature. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2016;29(4):613-623. - PubMed
    1. Murphy RF, Mooney JF, 3rd. Current concepts in neuromuscular scoliosis. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2019;12(2):220-227. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pruijs JE, van Tol MJ, van Kesteren RG, van Nieuwenhuizen O. Neuromuscular scoliosis: clinical evaluation pre- and postoperative. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2000;9(4):217-220. - PubMed
    1. Helenius IJ, Viehweger E, Castelein RM. Cerebral palsy with dislocated hip and scoliosis: what to deal with first? J Child Orthop. 2020;14(1):24-29. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lonstein JE, Akbarnia A. Operative treatment of spinal deformities in patients with cerebral palsy or mental retardation. An analysis of one hundred and seven cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;65(1):43-55. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources