Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Apr 3;14(1):29.
doi: 10.1007/s13679-025-00625-z.

Peer Intervention in Obesity and Physical Activity: Effectiveness and Implementation

Affiliations
Review

Peer Intervention in Obesity and Physical Activity: Effectiveness and Implementation

Keith J Topping. Curr Obes Rep. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: This paper reports the effectiveness of peer intervention in physical activity and obesity, with a focus on implementation. Peer intervention is a parallel method to traditional professional clinical processes, often targeting hard to reach populations. It includes peer education, peer counseling and peer support.

Recent findings: There were ten reviews on Physical Activity and seven on Obesity. Six reviews on obesity had mainly positive results; one on obesity in mental health was more negative. About two-thirds of reviews of Physical Activity interventions had positive outcomes. The overall effect was moderate. There were 39 single studies on Obesity and 46 on Physical Activity. 36% of Obesity studies and 13% of Physical Activity studies were from developing countries. Three single studies from developing countries and three from developed countries were elaborated. The extensively described implementation program was from a developed country. Discussion of limitations and strengths led to recommendations for implementation and evaluation. Overall, peer intervention in both obesity and physical activity showed quite strong evidence of effectiveness. Had all studies followed the implementation/evaluation recommendations, the strength of evidence might have been better. Future research should focus on cost-effectiveness and long-term follow-up.

Keywords: Developing countries; Implementation; Peer counseling; Peer education; Peer intervention; Peer support.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethical Approval: This research study was conducted retrospectively from data already published and no ethics approval or participant consent were required. Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA Flowchart for Obesity and Physical Activity

References

    1. World Health Organization (WHO). (2024). Obesity and overweight. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight/ Accessed September 1, 2024.
    1. Topping KJ. Peer interventions for health and wellbeing. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.; 2025. 10.1201/9781003438366. https://www.routledge.com/9781032572109.
    1. Campos DG, Fütterer T, Gfrörer T, Lavelle-Hill R, Murayama K, König L et al. Screening smarter, not harder: A comparative analysis of machine learning screening algorithms and heuristic stopping criteria for systematic reviews in educational research. Educ Psychol Rev 2024; 36(1), 19. 10.1007/s10648-024-09862-5.
    1. Nickols-Richardson SM, Nelson SA, Corbin MA. Peer nutrition education in childhood and adolescence: Evidence-based guidance for impactful programs. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014;46(4):S196. 10.1016/j.jneb.2014.04.211.
    1. Vangeepuram N, Angeles J, Lopez-Belin P, Arniella G, Horowitz CR. Youth peer led lifestyle modification interventions: A narrative literature review. Eval Program Plann. 2020;83:101871. 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101871. - PMC - PubMed