Prioritizing gaps in stroke care: A two-round Delphi process
- PMID: 40178329
- PMCID: PMC11969492
- DOI: 10.1177/23969873251329841
Prioritizing gaps in stroke care: A two-round Delphi process
Abstract
Background: Despite international recognition of stroke as a significant health priority, discrepancies persist between the target values for stroke quality measures and the actual values that are achieved in clinical practice, referred to as gaps. This study aimed to reach consensus among international experts on prioritizing gaps in stroke care.
Methods: A two-round Delphi process was conducted, surveying an international expert panel in the field of stroke care and cerebrovascular medicine, including patient representatives, healthcare professionals, researchers, policymakers, and medical directors. Experts scored the importance and required effort to close 13 gaps throughout the stroke care continuum and proposed potential solutions. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative analysis methods.
Results: In the first and second Delphi rounds, 35 and 30 experts participated, respectively. Expert consensus was reached on the high importance of closing 11 out of 13 gaps. Two out of 13 gaps were considered moderately important to close, with expert consensus for one of these two gaps. Expert consensus indicated that only one gap, related to the prevention of complications after stroke, requires moderate effort to close, whereas the others were considered to require high effort to close. Key focus areas for potential solutions included: "Care infrastructure," "Geographic disparities," "Interdisciplinary collaboration," and "Advocacy and funding."
Conclusions: While closing gaps in stroke care primarily requires high effort and substantial resources, targeted interventions in the identified key focus areas may provide feasible and clinically meaningful improvements.
Keywords: Delphi technique; Stroke; health services; quality improvement; quality indicators; quality measures.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of conflicting interestThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Prof. Dr. Dominick McCabe’s Vascular Neurology Research program is currently supported by grants from The Meath Foundation, Ireland; The Adelaide Health Foundation, Ireland; The Vascular Neurology Research Foundation Ireland; the Enterprise Ireland-Innovation Partnership Programme (co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund); and by unrestricted educational grant funding from Werfen, Spain; Sysmex UK/Siemens, Germany; SINNOWA Medical Science & Technology Co., China; and Acquis BI Technology Ltd., Ireland. The other authors report no competing interests.
References
-
- Brainin M, Feigin VL, Norrving B, et al. World Stroke Organization Board of Directors. Global prevention of stroke and dementia: the WSO declaration. Lancet Neurol 2020; 19(6): 487–488. - PubMed
-
- GBD 2016 DALYs and HALE Collaborators. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 333 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 2017; 390: 1260–1344. - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
