Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 May;70(5):583-592.
doi: 10.1089/respcare.12540. Epub 2025 Apr 3.

Artificial Intelligence for the Detection of Patient-Ventilator Asynchrony

Affiliations
Review

Artificial Intelligence for the Detection of Patient-Ventilator Asynchrony

Abdulhakim Tlimat et al. Respir Care. 2025 May.

Abstract

Patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA) is a challenge to invasive mechanical ventilation characterized by misalignment of ventilatory support and patient respiratory effort. PVA is highly prevalent and associated with adverse clinical outcomes, including increased work of breathing, oxygen consumption, and risk of barotrauma. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a potentially transformative solution offering capabilities for automated detection of PVA. This narrative review characterizes the landscape of AI models designed for PVA detection and quantification. A comprehensive literature search identified 13 studies, spanning diverse settings and patient populations. Machine learning (ML) techniques, derivation datasets, types of asynchronies detected, and performance metrics were assessed to provide a contemporary view of AI in this domain. We reviewed 166 articles published between 1989 and April 2024, of which 13 were included, encompassing 332 participants and analyzing >5.8 million breaths. Patient counts ranged between 8 and 107 and breath data ranged between 1,375 and 4.2 M. The reason for invasive mechanical ventilation use was given as ARDS in three articles, whereas the remainder had different invasive mechanical ventilation indications. Various ML methods as well as newer deep learning techniques were used to address PVA types. Sensitivity and specificity of 10 of the 13 models were >0.9, and 8 models reported accuracy of >0.9. AI models have significant potential to address PVA in invasive mechanical ventilation, displaying high accuracy across various populations and asynchrony types. This showcases their potential to accurately detect and quantify PVA. Future work should focus on model validation in diverse clinical settings and patient populations.

Keywords: Patient ventilator asynchrony; artificial intelligence; predictive modeling.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Gilstrap D, MacIntyre N. Patient-ventilator interactions. Implications for clinical management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013;188(9):1058–1068; doi: 10.1164/rccm.201212-2214CI - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Haro C, Ochagavia A, López-Aguilar J, et al. ; Asynchronies in the Intensive Care Unit (ASYNICU) Group . Patient-ventilator asynchronies during mechanical ventilation: current knowledge and research priorities. Intensive Care Med Exp 2019;7(Suppl 1):43; doi: 10.1186/s40635-019-0234-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Oliveira B, Aljaberi N, Taha A, et al. Patient-ventilator dyssynchrony in critically ill patients. J Clin Med Res 2021;10(19). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holanda MA, Vasconcelos R, Ferreira JC, et al. Patient-ventilator asynchrony. J Bras Pneumol 2018;44(4):321–333; doi: 10.1590/s1806-37562017000000185 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Varon J, Fromm R, Rodarte J, et al. Prevalence of patient-ventilator asynchrony in critically ill patients. Chest 1994;106(2 Suppl):141S–144S.