Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1985;54(1):12-5.
doi: 10.1007/BF00426291.

The influence of cardiorespiratory fitness on the decrement in maximal aerobic power at high altitude

The influence of cardiorespiratory fitness on the decrement in maximal aerobic power at high altitude

A J Young et al. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1985.

Abstract

There are conflicting reports in the literature which imply that the decrement in maximal aerobic power experienced by a sea-level (SL) resident sojourning at high altitude (HA) is either smaller or larger for the more aerobically "fit" person. In the present study, data collected during several investigations conducted at an altitude of 4300 m were analyzed to determine if the level of aerobic fitness influenced the decrement in maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) at HA. The VO2max of 51 male SL residents was measured at an altitude of 50 m and again at 4300 m. The subjects' ages, heights, and weights (mean +/- SE) were 22 +/- 1 yr, 177 +/- 7 cm and 78 +/- 2 kg, respectively. The subjects' VO2max ranged from 36 to 60 ml X kg -1 X min -1 (mean +/- SE = 48 +/- 1) and the individual values were normally distributed within this range. Likewise, the decrement in VO2max at HA was normally distributed from 3 ml X kg-1 X min-1 (9% VO2max at SL) to 29 ml X kg-1 X min-1 (54% VO2max at SL), and averaged 13 +/- 1 ml X kg-1 X min-1 (27 +/- 1% VO2max at SL). The linear correlation coefficient between aerobic fitness and the magnitude of the decrement in VO2max at HA expressed in absolute terms was r = 0.56, or expressed as % VO2max at SL was r = 0.30; both were statistically significant (p less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1980 Aug;49(2):311-8 - PubMed
    1. Ergonomics. 1972 Jan;15(1):25-32 - PubMed
    1. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1980 Sep;49(3):456-61 - PubMed
    1. J Appl Physiol. 1967 Mar;22(3):555-64 - PubMed
    1. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1978 May;44(5):813-7 - PubMed