Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Apr 3;25(1):125.
doi: 10.1186/s12906-025-04864-4.

Using patient-reported outcomes in clinical studies for cardiovascular diseases of Traditional Chinese medicine worldwide: a cross-sectional study

Affiliations
Review

Using patient-reported outcomes in clinical studies for cardiovascular diseases of Traditional Chinese medicine worldwide: a cross-sectional study

Hao Liu et al. BMC Complement Med Ther. .

Abstract

Background and purpose: Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) represent a major global health challenge. Clinical research is increasingly leveraging patient perspectives to evaluate the efficacy of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) in treating these conditions. This study reviews and summarizes the application and characteristics of Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in TCM for CVD, the overarching goal is to provide a resource that can guide potential research directions for PROs endpoints in future TCM CVD clinical research.

Methods: We searched clinical studies of TCM for CVD from the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform registered between January 1, 2010, and February 22, 2025. The outcome types, whether PRO measures (PROMs) explicitly mentioned, study design, clinical study phases,age, gender, and geographic region were analyzed. We classified the studies that explicitly specified PROs into 15 categories based on the International Classification of Diseases-11 (ICD-11),and compared their PROMs with the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET).

Results: A total of 636 TCM CVD studies were included, of which 394 employed PROs. However, 103 studies did not specify the PROMs utilized, including 33 that involved TCM syndrome scores. None of the most frequently used PROMs were TCM-specific. The most frequently studied disease categories - chronic coronary heart diseases and heart failure - employed PROMs that were basically aligned with COMET recommendations. In contrast, other disease categories were not aligned with COMET.

Conclusion: In TCM clinical research on CVD, PROs have been commonly adopted as outcome measures, with usage steadily increasing. However, the application of TCM-specific PROMs remains limited, revealing a significant gap. PROMs recommended by COMET should be further investigated across a broader range of CVD categories. Furthermore, there is an urgent need for patient-centered research on TCM syndrome scores, highlighting the importance of developing robust, standardized TCM-specific PROMs tailored to this field.

Keywords: Cardiovascular diseases; Clinical trial registry; Patient-reported outcomes; Traditional Chinese medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study used publicly available data and did not require ethical approval. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of study identification. ICTRP: International Clinical Trials Registry Platform; CVD: cardiovascular diseases; PROs: patient-reported outcomes; PROMs: patient-reported outcomes measures
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Number of clinical studies analyzed
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a Number of studies including PROs. b Number of participants in studies including PROs. Mix: means the study's target disorders included the combination of two or more cardiovascular conditions, such as hypertension and coronary heart disease complicated with heart failure, coronary heart disease with slow arrhythmias, atrial fibrillation with chronic heart failure. Others: means that the included studies were recruiting patients with cardiovascular disease combined with other systemic conditions, such as coronary artery disease combined with diabetes

Similar articles

References

    1. Martin SS, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, Anderson CAM, Arora P, Avery CL, et al. 2024 heart disease and stroke statistics: a report of US and global data from the American heart association. Circulation. 2024;149:e347-913. - PubMed
    1. Mensah GA, Roth GA, Fuster V. The global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors: 2020 and beyond. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74:2529–32. - PubMed
    1. Algurén B, Coenen M, Malm D, Fridlund B, Mårtensson J, Årestedt K, et al. A scoping review and mapping exercise comparing the content of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) across heart disease-specific scales. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020;4: 7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. de Leon CFM, Grady KL, Eaton C, Rucker-Whitaker C, Janssen I, Calvin J, et al. Quality of life in a diverse population of patients with heart failure: BASELINE FINDINGS FROM THE HEART FAILURE ADHERENCE AND RETENTION TRIAL (HART). J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2009;29:171–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kornowski R. Patient-reported outcome measures in cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2023;9:119–27. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources