Molecular Analysis of Cutaneous Sarcomatoid Neoplasms Frequently Identifies Melanoma Driver Variants
- PMID: 40181677
- DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000002390
Molecular Analysis of Cutaneous Sarcomatoid Neoplasms Frequently Identifies Melanoma Driver Variants
Abstract
Primary cutaneous neoplasms that lack definitive histologic and immunophenotypic evidence of differentiation are a heterogeneous group of tumors with diverse prognoses and management options. These include undifferentiated and dedifferentiated melanoma (UM/DM), atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX), pleomorphic dermal sarcoma (PDS), and sarcomatoid squamous cell carcinoma. Diagnosis requires careful correlation between the clinicopathologic and molecular features, and the finding of a MAPK pathway variant commonly associated with melanoma may support the diagnosis of melanoma over other tumors in this group. To examine the frequency of typical melanoma-associated MAPK pathway-related variants ( BRAF, NRAS, KIT, GNAQ, GNA11 ) among a cohort of primary cutaneous sarcomatoid neoplasms, we conducted a retrospective analysis of 37 cases of immunohistologically unclassifiable primary cutaneous neoplasms, submitted for targeted NGS analysis. All cases lacked a history of a prior relevant tumor, were negative for melanocytic markers (S100, SOX10, HMB45, and Melan-A), or showed <5% staining with 1 or 2 of these markers. Other lineage markers were negative. We identified typical melanoma driver variants in 7 cases (7/37, 19%), including NRAS (5/37, 14%), KIT (1/37, 3%), and GNAQ (1/37, 3%). There were no significant differences in age, sex, tumor site, or mitotic rate between patients with and without a melanoma driver variant. Melanoma cases were thicker (16.3 vs. 9.25 mm, P =0.041) and more likely to show epithelioid cell phenotype ( P =0.008). In our cohort, nearly 20% of patients with immunohistologically unclassifiable cutaneous tumors could be reclassified as having primary UM/DM after molecular testing, thereby opening alternative management pathways.
Keywords: dedifferentiated tumour; melanoma; molecular analysis; pathology; undifferentiated tumour.
Copyright © 2025 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: R.A.S. has received fees for professional services from SkylineDx BV, IO Biotech ApS, MetaOptima Technology Inc., F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Evaxion, Provectus Biopharmaceuticals Australia, Qbiotics, Novartis, Merck Sharp & Dohme, NeraCare, AMGEN Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb, Myriad Genetics, and GlaxoSmithKline. For the remaining authors none were declared.
References
-
- Baraban E, Cooper K. Dedifferentiated and undifferentiated neoplasms: a conceptual approach. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2020;5:50682.
-
- Helbig D, Ziemer M, Dippel E, et al. S1-guideline atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX) and pleomorphic dermal sarcoma (PDS). J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2022;20:235–243.
-
- Wang WL, Torres-Cabala C, Curry JL, et al. Metastatic atypical fibroxanthoma: a series of 11 cases with minimal or no subcutaneous involvement. Am J Dermatopathol. 2015;37:455–461.
-
- Logan IT, Vroobel KM, le Grange F, et al. Pleomorphic dermal sarcoma: clinicopathological features and outcomes from a 5-year tertiary referral center experience. Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2022;5:e1583.
-
- Seth R, Agarwala SS, Messersmith H, et al. Systemic therapy for melanoma: ASCO Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41:4794–4820.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
