Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May;30(3):e70037.
doi: 10.1111/nicc.70037.

Communication difficulties in mechanically ventilated voiceless patients in intensive care units: A qualitative study

Sara Brambilla  1 , Davide Ausili  1 , Giulia Locatelli  1 , Stefania Di Mauro  1 , Giacomo Bellani  2   3 , Michela Luciani  1
Affiliations

Communication difficulties in mechanically ventilated voiceless patients in intensive care units: A qualitative study

Sara Brambilla et al. Nurs Crit Care. 2025 May.

Abstract

Background: Mechanically ventilated patients are unable to verbally communicate due to the endotracheal tube or tracheostomy, rendering them temporarily 'voiceless'. More and more patients are conscious during mechanical ventilation because of a new paradigm based on mild/no sedation. Communicating with conscious voiceless patients can be complex and frustrating, leading to negative outcomes and experiences for patients, family members and health care professionals.

Aim: To explore the negative effects of the inability to communicate verbally among voiceless patients in intensive care units (ICUs), considering the perspectives of voiceless patients, health care professionals and family members.

Study design: This qualitative study uses Interpretive Description methodology. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients, family members and health care professionals. Data were collected at three ICUs in Italy over 3 months. Data were analysed using the Rapid and Rigorous qualitative data analysis.

Results: Forty-three people were interviewed (10 patients, 13 caregivers, 13 nurses and 7 physicians). Three major themes were identified: perception of communication difficulties, negative impacts on relationships and emotions, and negative effects on care. These findings indicate that communication difficulties in ICU have negative emotional and psychological consequences for all participants and the health care provided.

Conclusions: Effective communication with voiceless patients is essential for their well-being and quality of care. Future research should focus on identifying and evaluating tailored communication methods for voiceless patients.

Relevance to clinical practice: This study emphasizes the importance of interventions improving voiceless communication, including training health care professionals and critical care nurses in alternative communication strategies, providing psychological support to voiceless patients, and encouraging extended family presence.

Keywords: communication; intensive care units; mechanical ventilation; qualitative research; voicelessness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Prof. Giacomo Bellani declares equities in DICO Technologies SRL. All the other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Graphical representation of themes.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gélinas C, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of pain, agitation/sedation, delirium, immobility, and sleep disruption in adult patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2018;46:e825‐e873. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000003299 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baumgarten M, Poulsen I. Patients' experiences of being mechanically ventilated in an ICU: a qualitative metasynthesis. Scand J Caring Sci. 2015;29:205‐214. doi:10.1111/scs.12177 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Danielis M, Povoli A, Mattiussi E, Palese A. Understanding patients' experiences of being mechanically ventilated in the intensive care unit: findings from a meta‐synthesis and meta‐summary. J Clin Nurs. 2020;29:2107‐2124. doi:10.1111/jocn.15259 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Freeman‐Sanderson A, Morris K, Elkins M. Characteristics of patient communication and prevalence of communication difficulty in the intensive care unit: an observational study. Aust Crit Care. 2019;32:373‐377. doi:10.1016/j.aucc.2018.09.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nilsen ML, Happ MB, Donovan H, Barnato A, Hoffman L, Sereika SM. Adaptation of a communication interaction behavior instrument for use in mechanically ventilated, nonvocal older adults. Nurs Res. 2014;63:3‐13. doi:10.1097/NNR.0000000000000012 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources