Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Mar 3;17(3):e79998.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.79998. eCollection 2025 Mar.

Hospital Investment Decisions and Prioritization of Clinical Programs

Affiliations
Review

Hospital Investment Decisions and Prioritization of Clinical Programs

Bishan Nandy. Cureus. .

Abstract

Making investment decisions in hospitals and prioritizing clinical programs are crucial to ensure optimal healthcare delivery, responsible use of resources, and long-term sustainability of an organization. This review examines the existing literature to identify the key factors influencing investment decisions, evaluates evidence-based frameworks for prioritizing resources, and articulates challenges and future directions for healthcare organizations. Critical drivers of hospital investments include financial health, demographics, ownership structure, and technology adoption. However, program budgeting and marginal analysis, health technology assessment, multi-criteria decision analysis, and evidence-based design frameworks will ensure that decisions are systematic and transparent. These tools help hospitals balance infrastructure investments, technology, specialized clinical programs, and emergency response. The dependence on past allocation practices, funding constraints, and stakeholder misalignment inhibits the best decision-making. For those barriers to be addressed, predictive analytics and artificial intelligence must already be in the evaluation process, as should configuration processes for interrelated tech, and collaboration among stakeholders should be fostered. Furthermore, investments aligned with sustainability principles and equity goals will be more resilient and adaptive to changes in the healthcare landscape. This review highlights the importance of healthcare organizations implementing holistic, evidence-based frameworks to guide investment decisions, including low-hanging fruit from today and industry best practices for tomorrow, shifting a provider's focus to ensure optimal patient outcomes, operational efficiencies, and sustainable growth.

Keywords: clinical program prioritization; decision-making frameworks; evidence-based frameworks; financial constraints; health technology assessment; healthcare 4.0 technologies; healthcare sustainability; hospital investment; predictive analytics; resource allocation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Similar articles

References

    1. Describing practices of priority setting and resource allocation in publicly funded health care systems of high-income countries. Seixas BV, Regier DA, Bryan S, Mitton C. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21:90. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Case studies that illustrate disinvestment and resource allocation decision-making processes in health care: a systematic review. Polisena J, Clifford T, Elshaug AG, Mitton C, Russell E, Skidmore B. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013;29:174–184. - PubMed
    1. Health care priority setting: principles, practice and challenges. Mitton C, Donaldson C. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2004;2:3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. International study of technology investment decisions at hospitals. Wernz C, Zhang H, Phusavat K. Ind Manag Data Syst. 2014;114:568–582.
    1. Evidence-based and value-based decision making about healthcare design: an economic evaluation of the safety and quality outcomes. Zadeh R, Sadatsafavi H, Xue R. HERD. 2015;8:58–76. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources