Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 5:30:2776.
doi: 10.4102/hsag.v30i0.2776. eCollection 2025.

Impact of a Fulbright award: A bibliometric analysis of persistence

Marie Hastings-Tolsma  1   2 , Charlene Downing  2 , Annie Temane  2 , L Amy Giles  1 , Jean L Hillyer  1 , Sean C Beatty  3
Affiliations

Impact of a Fulbright award: A bibliometric analysis of persistence

Marie Hastings-Tolsma et al. Health SA. .

Abstract

Background: While hundreds of Fulbright awards have been given, little is known about the impact of such engagement despite a goal of increased research partnership and collaboration.

Aim: The extent and impact of a Fulbright award was explored by examining referencing of primary collaborative publications.

Setting: Seven databases and two alternative sources from 2013 to 2023 were reviewed.

Methods: Co-citation analysis identified pairs of referenced articles. Subsequently, a bibliometric approach was used to quantitatively and visually capture and analyse publications using data visualisation software.

Results: A search of sources found 773 citations citing the 16 primary works. Following the elimination of duplicates, 273 publications remained. Also examined was the non-scientific downstream noted in social media (n = 66). Based on co-citation analysis, there was a sharp uptick in the utilisation of primary citations (n = 273) compared to a 2019 analysis (n = 42). Journal Impact Factors of citing works had a high of 5.379 from 2.079 in 2019. Primary citations in open access journals demonstrated greater referencing, and the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated utilisation of some works. Citing works focussed on three clusters: compassion fatigue, birth stories and Ubuntu. Most citing works originated from South Africa and the United States of America and consisted of multidisciplinary investigators with interfacility alliance and team science engagement. Nursing or midwifery were the main disciplines of first authors in citing articles (n = 153).

Conclusion: Co-citation analysis and downstream use of publications in social media provided evidence of the impact of a Fulbright award on scholarship with persistence over time.

Contributions: Fulbright awards promote collaborative teamwork between disciplines and is of clear benefit to scientists.

Keywords: Fulbright award; altmetrics; bibliometric analysis; bibliometric mapping; bibliometrics; citation analysis; data visualisation; infographics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article. The author, M.H.-T., serves as an editorial board member of this journal. The peer review process for this submission was handled independently, and the author had no involvement in the editorial decision-making process for this manuscript. The authors has no other competing interests to declare.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Search strategy and selection of articles related to the use of 16 primary articles.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Citation counts (n = 273) resulting from primary works (N = 16), 2013–2023.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Global citation (n = 273) distribution citing 16 primary works (2013–2023).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Citation (n = 273) distribution citing 16 primary works, detailed Europe and Middle East distribution.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Persistence of reference studies (N = 16).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Abideen, P.S., 2022, ‘Bibliometric analysis of the coronavirus research publications data before and after the outbreak of the COVID: A comparison’, DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology 42(3), 139–148. 10.14429/djlit.42.3.17350 - DOI
    1. Achury-Saldana, D.M., Castaneda-Rodriguez, L.A. & Perianes-Rodriguez, A., 2022, ‘Differences in scientific collaboration and their effects on research influence: A quantitative analysis of nursing publications in Latin America (Scopus, 2005–2020)’, Heliyon 8(10), e11047. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11047 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adams, J. & Gurney, K.A., 2018, ‘Bilateral and multilateral coauthorship and citation impact: Patterns in UK and US international collaboration’, Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics 3, 12. 10.3389/frma.2018.00012 - DOI
    1. Alfonzo, P., Sakraida, T. & Hastings-Tolsma, M., 2014, ‘Bibliometrics: Visualizing the impact of nursing research’, Online Journal of Nursing Informatics 18(1), 1–17.
    1. Altmetric , 2023, What are altmetrics? viewed 02 July 2024, from https://www.altmetric.com/about-us/what-are-altmetrics/.

LinkOut - more resources