Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul;132(8):1166-1177.
doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.18158. Epub 2025 Apr 4.

An In-Depth Analysis and Classification of Placental Causes of Stillbirth: A 10-Year Retrospective Study of a Regional Stillbirth Registry

Leila Caillault  1   2 , Rémi Béranger  2 , Philippe Loget  3 , Pauline Blanc-Petitjean  2 , Maela Le Lous  4   5 , Gwenaelle Le Bouar  4 , Alain Lescoat  1   2 , Ronan Garlantézec  2 , Nicolas Belhomme  1   2 ; Ille et Vilaine stillbirth study group
Collaborators, Affiliations

An In-Depth Analysis and Classification of Placental Causes of Stillbirth: A 10-Year Retrospective Study of a Regional Stillbirth Registry

Leila Caillault et al. BJOG. 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction: Abnormal placental lesions are commonly identified in stillbirth. Interpreting these lesions and their contribution to fetal demise presents significant challenges. Recommended CODAC classification does not include detailed placental examination results.

Objective: This study reports abnormal placental patterns in relation to the distribution of stillbirth causes in order to refine the categories of causes.

Design: Data from the Ille-Et-Vilaine Stillbirth cohort, an exhaustive register of stillbirth cases across the Ille-et-Vilaine French department, were implemented in 2010.

Setting: All seven maternity wards in the Ille-et-Vilaine department, France.

Population: All cases of stillbirth located in the Ille-et-Vilaine department between 2010 and 2019.

Methods: Descriptive statistics were used with the chi-squared test.

Main outcome measures: All placental examinations were reported following the Amsterdam consensus. Cause of death was ascertained according to the CODAC (Classification of Cause of Death and Associated Conditions) classification during multidisciplinary meetings.

Results: A total of 566 stillbirths were documented. The most frequent stillbirth causes were placental cause (36%), followed by umbilical cord (11%) and infections (9%). Stillbirth remained unexplained in 17% of cases. Small placenta and maternal malperfusion emerged as the most frequent placental lesions within the placental stillbirth group (65%), but also within the maternal cause groups (65%).

Conclusion: Placental vascular anomalies were the most frequent cause of stillbirth in this study. Based on the combined use of international classification and observation of histological anomalies, our data suggest the existence of a vascular stillbirth group defined by vascular lesions associated with maternal or fetal expression.

Keywords: placental pathology; stillbirth; uteroplacental insufficiency.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Smith G. C. and Fretts R. C., “Stillbirth,” Lancet 370 (2007): 1715–1725. - PubMed
    1. Lawn J. E., Blencowe H., Waiswa P., et al., “Stillbirths: Rates, Risk Factors, and Acceleration Towards 2030,” Lancet 387 (2016): 587–603. - PubMed
    1. Huchon C., Deffieux X., Beucher G., et al., “Pregnancy Loss: French Clinical Practice Guidelines,” European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 201 (2016): 18–26. - PubMed
    1. Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network Writing Group , “Causes of Death Among Stillbirths,” Journal of the American Medical Association 306 (2011): 2459–2468. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reinebrant H. E., Leisher S. H., Coory M., et al., “Making Stillbirths Visible: A Systematic Review of Globally Reported Causes of Stillbirth,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 125 (2018): 212–224. - PubMed