Generating evidence to support the role of AI in diabetic eye screening: considerations from the UK National Screening Committee
- PMID: 40185647
- DOI: 10.1016/j.landig.2024.12.004
Generating evidence to support the role of AI in diabetic eye screening: considerations from the UK National Screening Committee
Abstract
Screening for diabetic retinopathy has been shown to reduce the risk of sight loss in people with diabetes, because of early detection and treatment of sight-threatening disease. There is long-standing interest in the possibility of automating parts of this process through artificial intelligence, commonly known as automated retinal imaging analysis software (ARIAS). A number of such products are now on the market. In the UK, Scotland has used a rules-based autograder since 2011, but the diabetic eye screening programmes in the rest of the UK rely solely on human graders. With more sophisticated machine learning-based ARIAS now available and greater challenges in terms of human grader capacity, in 2019 the UK's National Screening Committee (NSC) was asked to consider the modification of diabetic eye screening in England with ARIAS. Following up on a review of ARIAS research highlighting the strengths and limitations of existing evidence, the NSC here sets out their considerations for evaluating evidence to support the introduction of ARIAS into the diabetic eye screening programme.
Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests XL reports consulting fees from Hardian Health and Conceivable Life Sciences, and a past role as a Health Scientist at Apple. CH is a member of the UK NSC, which funded the Exeter Test Group at University of Exeter to do evidence review of screening for diabetic retinopathy. CE has received a grant or contract and travel support to attend MacTel international clinical study meetings from the Lowy Medical Research Institute; and consulting fees from Heidelberg Engineering, Inozyme Pharma, and Boehringer Ingelheim. AT has received consulting fees from Annexon, Apellis, Bayer, Genentech, Iveric Bio, Novartis, Oxurion, Roche, Heidelberg Engineering, Ocular Therapeutix, Opthea, Oculogics, and Boehringer Ingelheim; payment or honoraria from Apellis; and sits on the Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for the Alvotech AVT06 study and J&J 1887 study. RG-W is a member of the UK NSC and Non-Executive Director at Moorfields Eye Hospital. SH is Chair of the UK NSC Artificial Intelligence Task Group, which received institutional funding from the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) biomedical research centre; is a member of the UK NSC Adult Reference Group and the NIHR health technology assessment prioritisation board; and is a Clinical Professional Advisor for the National Health Service England diabetic eye screening programme; and reports payment for expert witness work from multiple instructing solicitors. PS reports consulting fees from Boehringer; grants or contracts from Zeiss, Centervue, Optos, and Bayer; speaker fees from Bayer and Topcon; and support for attending meetings from Boehringer and Bayer. ST-P is a member of the UK NSC and Chair of the UK NSC Research and Methodology Group, funded by an NIHR Research Professorship (NIHR302434). All other authors declare no competing interests. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
