Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 4;15(1):11596.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89402-5.

Gut microbiota diversity among humans, elephants, livestock and wild herbivores in Chitwan National Park bears implications for conservation medicine

Affiliations

Gut microbiota diversity among humans, elephants, livestock and wild herbivores in Chitwan National Park bears implications for conservation medicine

Rajesh Man Rajbhandari et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Gut microbiome influences host health and well-being. Co-occurring hosts may exchange disease-causing bacteria belonging to these microbial communities. Therefore, monitoring gut microbiota composition in wildlife and humans is paramount to prevent zoonotic diseases, thus protecting and strengthening public health. We characterized diversity and abundance of the gut microbiome bacterial component across mahouts (captive elephant trainers and handlers), their pachyderms, livestock and wild herbivores in and around Chitwan National Park (Nepal). Firmicutes and Bacteroidota were invariably the dominant phyla. In humans, the relative abundance of Firmicutes was higher, the alpha diversity lower and beta diversity different compared to other host categories. Livestock and wild herbivores displayed similar alpha and beta diversity due to the presence of Proteobacteria, Actinobacteriota and Verrucomicrobiota. Elephants had a higher alpha diversity, and a significant beta diversity compared to other mammals. Our results suggest that taxonomic affiliation and diet niche are the main drivers of gut microbiota composition. Nevertheless, Mycobacterium and other potentially pathogenic bacteria genera were detected in elephants and livestock other than wild herbivores. These findings shed light on microbiota sharing and interlinking in each environment, thereby highlighting the importance of conservation medicine to better our understanding of health in co-occurring host species.

Keywords: Bacterial function; Human–wildlife–livestock–environment interface; Microbiome; Nepal; One Health; Zoonosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics statement: The ethical approval of the study was provided by the Nepal Ethical Review Board of Nepal Health Research Council (IRC number 312/2018). All individuals gave written informed consent before participation during the study. The experimental protocol used in the present study was approved by the Bioethics Committee of BIOPOLIS/CIBIO-InBIO (University of Porto). Studies were conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study area and sampling locations. (a) Map of southern Asia evidencing the location of Nepal (yellow shape). (b) Location of Chitwan National Park (green shape) in Nepal. (c) Physical map of Chitwan National Park and its buffer zone evidencing the main rivers. (d) Sampling locations within the park and the buffer zone (see Table S1 for further details). Maps were created in QGIS v3.30.0 (https://www.qgis.org/).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Phyla composition of gut microbiota across humans (n = 16), livestock (n = 15), captive elephants (n = 39) and wild herbivores (hog deer: n = 2; sambar deer: n = 1; spotted deer: n = 58; wild boar: n = 16; greater one-horned rhino: n = 28). Animal photos (modified) are not to scale; for credits see the Acknowledgements and Appendix S1.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Sharing of bacterial genera across the gut microbiota of humans (mahouts), livestock, captive elephants and wild herbivores. The 79 genera common to all four host categories represent the following percentages: 54.11% in humans; 32.11% in livestock; 17.4 in captive elephants and 10.75% in wild herbivores. Animal photos (modified) are not to scale; for credits see the Acknowledgements and Appendix S1.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Alpha diversity based on Faith’s phylogenetic diversity (a) and Shannon diversity metrics (b) (α = 0.05) across different host categories: captive elephants, livestock, humans and wild herbivores (left to right). Animal photos (modified) are not to scale; for credits see the Acknowledgements and Appendix S1.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Beta diversity based on: (a) Bray–Curtis, (b) Weighted and (c) Unweighted Unifrac distance metrics. Animal photos (modified) are not to scale; for credits see the Acknowledgements and Appendix S1.

Similar articles

References

    1. D’Argenio, V. & Salvatore, F. The role of the gut microbiome in the healthy adult status. Clin. Chim. Acta451, 97–102. 10.1016/J.CCA.2015.01.003 (2015). - PubMed
    1. Gray, W. R. & Jacobs, J. P. Modulation of host physiology and pathophysiology by the gut microbiome. Nutrients16, 361. 10.3390/nu16030361 (2024). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hooper, L. V., Littman, D. R. & Macpherson, A. J. Interactions between the microbiota and the immune system. Science336, 1268–1273. 10.1126/science.122349 (2012). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Methé, B. A. et al. A framework for human microbiome research. Nature486, 215. 10.1038/NATURE11209 (2012). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Turnbaugh, P. J. et al. A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins. Nature457, 480–484. 10.1038/nature07540 (2009). - PMC - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources