Reanalysis of unsolved prenatal exome sequencing for structural defects: diagnostic yield and contribution of postnatal/postmortem features
- PMID: 40186013
- PMCID: PMC12048470
- DOI: 10.1038/s41431-025-01823-y
Reanalysis of unsolved prenatal exome sequencing for structural defects: diagnostic yield and contribution of postnatal/postmortem features
Abstract
In 30-40% of fetuses with structural defects, the causal variant remains undiagnosed after karyotype, chromosomal microarray, and exome sequencing. This study presents the results of a reanalysis of unsolved prenatal ES (pES) cases and investigates how postnatal/postmortem phenotyping contributes to identifying relevant variants. pES data was prospectively reanalyzed for unsolved cases enrolled in the AnDDI-Prénatome cohort study. Postnatal/postmortem data were included with prenatal features using Human Phenotype Ontology terms up to 3 years after pES. The reanalysis involved updating bioinformatic processing and querying raw data using a GREP query. We reanalyzed 58/94 (62%) unsolved pES cases, including 8 variants of unknown significance. Data for clinical examination at birth was available for all live newborns, and postmortem examination was available in 12 terminated fetuses. Additional features were identified at birth in 27/58 cases (44%): 9 terminated fetuses, 2 stillbirths, and 16 live newborns. One diagnosis (SNAPC4) was obtained through a periodic query following recent associations with human disease, and without additional clinical data. Three additional VUS were identified through reanalysis with the addition of new clinical features, illustrating the limited contribution of updated postnatal/postmortem phenotyping in identifying relevant variants after negative pES. In conclusion, the benefit of prospective reanalysis of unsolved pES is limited, even over time. Postnatal genome sequencing may be a more appropriate option than reanalysis with postnatal/postmortem phenotyping to establish a causal diagnosis.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Human Genetics.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval: All fetuses were initially included in this AnDDI-Prénatome study (NCT03964441), approved by institutional review board and ethics committee. Informed written consent was obtained from all subjects and participating family members.
References
-
- Liu L, Oza S, Hogan D, Perin J, Rudan I, Lawn JE, et al. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2000-13, with projections to inform post-2015 priorities: an updated systematic analysis. Lancet 2015;385:430–40. - PubMed
-
- Bruel AL, Vitobello A, Tran Mau-Them F, Nambot S, Sorlin A, Denommé-Pichon AS, et al. Next-generation sequencing approaches and challenges in the diagnosis of developmental anomalies and intellectual disability. Clin Genet 2020;98:433–44. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical