Expert consensus on patterns of progression in kidney cancer after adjuvant immunotherapy and subsequent treatment strategies
- PMID: 40186886
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2025.102925
Expert consensus on patterns of progression in kidney cancer after adjuvant immunotherapy and subsequent treatment strategies
Abstract
Immunotherapy has changed the management of localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) since the approval of adjuvant pembrolizumab, which demonstrated significant improvements in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients at intermediate and high risk of recurrence. This new approach impacts rescue strategies in patients who relapse after local treatment and during or after adjuvant pembrolizumab. Nevertheless, there is currently no robust scientific evidence on therapeutic decision-making in this clinical situation, representing an area for further debate and research. In this article, a group of experts from the Genitourinary Alliance for Research and Development (GUARD) have reviewed the available scientific evidence to establish the basis for therapeutic decision-making in patients with ccRCC who progress after adjuvant treatment with immunotherapy. Despite the lack of randomized clinical trials in this setting, this group of experts recommends classifying patients according to relapse volume (oligometastatic vs. polymetastatic), time to relapse and certain molecular characteristics. Rescue treatments beyond relapse should be individualized and might include locoregional treatments such as surgery or radiotherapy as well as antiangiogenic therapies in patients defined as resistant to immunotherapy.
Keywords: Adjuvant treatment; Clear cell renal cell carcinoma; Immunotherapy; Recurrence; Treatment strategies.
Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Teresa Alonso-Gordoa has received fees for speaker, consultancy, research and other non-financial support from Adacap, Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Ipsen Pharma, Johnson & Johnson, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Pfizer and Roche. Mario Domínguez-Esteban has no conflicts of interest. Òscar Reig-Torras has stock and other ownership interests from Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer and Merck; received honoraria from Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen Pharma, Merck and Pfizer; speaker engagements from Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen Pharma, Janssen-Cilag, Pfizer, Sanofi; and travel, accommodation and expenses from Ipsen Pharma and Merck. Georgia Anguera-Palacios has received advisory/consultancy fees from Ipsen Pharma, Merck and Pfizer; and honoraria from Astellas, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen Pharma, Johnson & Johnson, Merck and Merck Sharp and Dohme. Hilario Martínez-Barros has no conflict of interest. Javier Molina-Cerrillo declares consultant, advisory or speaker fees from AAA Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen Pharma, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi; and research grants from Ipsen Pharma, Janssen Cilag, Pfizer and Roche. Patricia Cruz has no conflict of interest. Pablo Maroto has received honoraria from Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Ipsen Pharma, Janssen Cilag and Pfizer.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical