SAPIEN 3 versus Myval transcatheter heart valves for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (COMPARE-TAVI 1): a multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial
- PMID: 40187364
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00106-0
SAPIEN 3 versus Myval transcatheter heart valves for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (COMPARE-TAVI 1): a multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial
Erratum in
-
Department of Error.Lancet. 2025 Jun 21;405(10496):2204. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01251-6. Lancet. 2025. PMID: 40543975 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a guideline-directed treatment for severe aortic stenosis and degenerated aortic bioprostheses. When new transcatheter heart valve (THV) platforms for TAVI are launched, they should be compared with best-in-practice contemporary THVs for their short-term and long-term performance. The COMPARE-TAVI 1 trial was designed to provide a head-to-head comparison of the SAPIEN 3 or SAPIEN 3 Ultra THVs and the Myval or Myval Octacor THVs.
Methods: This multicentre, all-comers, randomised, non-inferiority trial was done at three university hospitals in Denmark. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, scheduled for transfemoral TAVI, and eligible for treatment with SAPIEN 3 THVs or Myval THVs. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to treatment with SAPIEN 3 (29 mm diameter) or SAPIEN 3 Ultra (20 mm, 23 mm, or 26 mm diameter) THVs or Myval or Myval Octacor THVs (20-32 mm diameter). The TAVI procedure was performed according to local practice and under local anaesthesia unless leaflet laceration was performed. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, stroke, moderate or severe aortic regurgitation, or moderate or severe haemodynamic THV deterioration at 1 year according to Third Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria. All patients assigned to THV treatment were included in the intention-to-treat analysis, and all patients who were treated as randomly assigned were included in the per-protocol analysis. With an expected event rate of 13%, the prespecified non-inferiority margin was 5·3%. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04443023, and is closed to accrual.
Findings: Between June 15, 2020, and Nov 3, 2023, 1031 patients were enrolled. Enrolment was paused twice because of patent-related legal proceedings. Of 1031 patients, 517 patients were randomly assigned to SAPIEN 3 THVs and 514 to Myval THVs. The median patient age was 81·6 years (IQR 77·6-85·0), and 415 (40%) of 1031 patients were female and 616 (60%) were male. The primary endpoint occurred in 67 (13%) of 517 patients randomly assigned to SAPIEN 3 THVs versus 71 (14%) of 514 patients randomly assigned to Myval THVs (risk difference -0·9% [one-sided upper 95% CI 4·4%]; pnon-inferiority=0·019).
Interpretation: Myval THVs were non-inferior to SAPIEN 3 THVs in terms of a 1-year composite endpoint of death, stroke, moderate or severe aortic regurgitation, or moderate or severe haemodynamic THV deterioration.
Funding: Meril Life Sciences, Vingmed Denmark, the Danish Heart Foundation, and the Central Denmark Region.
Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests CJT reports institutional research grants from Meril Life Sciences, the Danish Heart Foundation, Vingmed Denmark, and the Central Denmark Region for the conduct of the COMPARE-TAVI 1 trial; proctor fees from Meril Life Sciences; and lecture fees from Edwards Lifesciences, Meril Life Sciences, Terumo, and Medtronic. PF reports proctor fees from Meril Life Sciences; lecture fees from Edwards Lifesciences, Meril Life Sciences, and Boston Scientific; and support for meeting attendance from Edwards Lifesciences and Meril Life Sciences. JSD reports travel support for meeting attendance from Edwards Life Sciences. TT reports lecture fees from Terumo and Chiesi; and travel support for meeting attendance from Chiesi. JE reports advisory board participation for Boston Scientific. BLN reports institutional research grants from the Novo Nordisk Foundation. EHC reports institutional research grants from Abbott; proctor fees from Edwards Lifesciences, Meril Life Sciences, Boston Scientific, and Abbott; and lecture fees from Edwards Life Sciences, Meril Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, and Abbott. HN reports institutional research grants from Meril Life Sciences and Vingmed Denmark, and lecture fees from Edwards Lifesciences and Meril Life Sciences. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Comment in
-
Head-to-head comparison of balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves.Lancet. 2025 Apr 19;405(10487):1316-1317. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00259-4. Epub 2025 Apr 2. Lancet. 2025. PMID: 40187365 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Early outcomes of the novel Myval THV series compared to SAPIEN THV series and Evolut THV series in individuals with severe aortic stenosis.EuroIntervention. 2025 Jan 20;21(2):e105-e118. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00951. EuroIntervention. 2025. PMID: 39589296 Clinical Trial.
-
LANDMARK comparison of early outcomes of newer-generation Myval transcatheter heart valve series with contemporary valves (Sapien and Evolut) in real-world individuals with severe symptomatic native aortic stenosis: a randomised non-inferiority trial.Lancet. 2024 Jun 22;403(10445):2695-2708. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00821-3. Epub 2024 May 22. Lancet. 2024. PMID: 38795719 Clinical Trial.
-
Immediate and Early Outcomes Following Myval Octacor Transcatheter Heart Valve Implantation for the Treatment of Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis: The OCTACOR-EU Study.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jul;106(1):511-520. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31563. Epub 2025 May 5. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025. PMID: 40325824
-
Effectiveness and Safety of Myval Versus Other Transcatheter Valves in Patients Undergoing TAVI: A Meta-Analysis.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Aug;106(2):820-829. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31611. Epub 2025 May 27. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025. PMID: 40421696 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Valve in valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV-TAVI) versus redo-Surgical aortic valve replacement (redo-SAVR): A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Interv Cardiol. 2018 Oct;31(5):661-671. doi: 10.1111/joic.12520. Epub 2018 May 20. J Interv Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 29781182
Cited by
-
Head-to-Head Comparison of Meril Myval Series Balloon-Expandable and Abbott Portico Series Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valves-A Single-Center Experience.Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Aug 6;61(8):1419. doi: 10.3390/medicina61081419. Medicina (Kaunas). 2025. PMID: 40870464 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical