An evidence-based tool for screening for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in primary care: The BREATH2 score
- PMID: 40187528
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2025.03.018
An evidence-based tool for screening for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in primary care: The BREATH2 score
Abstract
Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains underdiagnosed in primary care settings, where echocardiography is not available. This study aimed to develop and validate a scoring system that does not include echocardiographic variables for HFpEF screening among patients with shortness of breath.
Methods: A total of 622 consecutive patients referred for exercise stress echocardiography were evaluated (283 HFpEF and 339 controls). Diagnosis of HFpEF was determined by the HFA-PEFF algorithm Steps 2-3.
Results: Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified age ≥65 years, coronary artery disease, elevated natriuretic peptide levels, anemia, cardiomegaly on chest radiography, and left ventricular high-voltage on electrocardiogram as independent predictors of having HFpEF. A weighted score, including the six predictors and atrial fibrillation, was created (BREATH2 score). The BREATH2 score accurately discriminated HFpEF from controls [area under the curve (AUC) 0.84, p < 0.0001], with a superior diagnostic ability to the H2FPEF score. The diagnostic accuracy was confirmed in an external validation cohort (n = 105, AUC 0.78, p < 0.0001) and in patients whose diagnosis was determined by exercise right heart catheterization (n = 79, AUC 0.75, p = 0.0001). The BREATH2 score classified each patient into different risk categories of having HFpEF, ranging from 4 % to 93 %.
Conclusions: The BREATH2 score can be an effective screening tool in primary care settings to help refer patients to a secondary hospital for further evaluation.
Keywords: Exercise stress testing; Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; Primary care; Risk score; Screening.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest Dr. Obokata received speaker honoraria from Novartis, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, and Nippon Boehringer-Ingelheim. Dr. Ishii received lecture fees from AstraZeneca Inc., Bayer Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Bristol-Myers Squibb Inc., Daiichi-Sankyo Pharma Inc., MSD K. K., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Ltd., Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Novartis Japan, and Pfizer Japan Inc. Dr. Kagiyama received speaker honoraria from Novartis, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, and Nippon Boehringer-Ingelheim, and was affiliated with a department endowed by Paramount Bed. Mr. Kawagoshi, Dr. Nishiya, and Dr. Yasui are employees of Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim. Boehringer Ingelheim was given the opportunity to review the manuscript for medical and scientific accuracy as it relates to Boehringer Ingelheim substances, as well as intellectual property considerations.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical