Treatment with methotrexate plus oral prednisolone versus triple therapy (methotrexate/sulfasalazine/hydroxychloroquine) plus intra-articular glucocorticoids in early rheumatoid arthritis: a prespecified nonrandomised subgroup analysis of clinical and radiographic data at 48 weeks from the NORD-STAR trial's conventional treatment arm
- PMID: 40188008
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ard.2025.03.002
Treatment with methotrexate plus oral prednisolone versus triple therapy (methotrexate/sulfasalazine/hydroxychloroquine) plus intra-articular glucocorticoids in early rheumatoid arthritis: a prespecified nonrandomised subgroup analysis of clinical and radiographic data at 48 weeks from the NORD-STAR trial's conventional treatment arm
Abstract
Objectives: In the NOrdic Rheumatic Diseases Strategy Trials And Registries (NORD-STAR) trial, the active conventional arm had 2 nonrandomised regimens: arm 1A (oral group; Sweden, Norway, Netherlands, and Iceland) and arm 1B (injection group; Denmark and Finland). We report clinical, patient-reported, safety, and radiographic outcomes after 48 weeks.
Methods: Oral group received methotrexate plus oral prednisolone (20.0 mg/d, tapered rapidly, discontinued week 36); Injection group received triple therapy (methotrexate, sulphasalazine, hydroxychloroquine) and mandatory intra-articular glucocorticoid injections. The primary end point was analysed by logistic regression with several approaches for handling missing outcomes.
Results: In total, 137 and 80 patients were included in the oral group and injection group; 78% vs. 89% completed, respectively. At 48 weeks, adjusted clinical disease activity index remission ≤2.8 rates (95% CI) were 36% (28-44) and 55% (42-68), respectively; the risk difference (primary outcome) was 19% (2-35). Similarly, key secondary clinical, patient-reported and safety outcomes showed numerically better results in the injection group vs oral group, for example, infections occurred in 53% vs 30%, respectively. Radiographic progression (Δtotal van der Heijde-modified Sharp Score) was low: oral group: adjusted mean, 0.26 (95% CI, 0.08-0.43); injection group: adjustedd mean, 0.80 (95% CI, 0.55-1.05). Cumulative dose of oral/intra-articular glucocorticoids (median) was 1905 mg prednisolone for the oral group and 165 mg for the injection group.
Conclusions: In treatment-naïve patients with early rheumatoid arthritis, triple therapy and mandatory glucocorticoid joint injections had numerically better clinical outcomes, fewer withdrawals, fewer adverse events, and lower cumulative dose of glucocorticoids, but slightly worse radiographic outcomes than treatment with methotrexate and oral prednisolone. These findings, although nonrandomised, suggest a potential for optimising treatment strategy with conventional therapies in early rheumatoid arthritis.
Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at http://www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf. The disclosures of the individual authors are summarised as follows: MLH received research grants from AbbVie, BMS, Eli Lily, MSD, Pfizer, Sandoz, Novartis, Nordforsk, Alfasigma and UCB and speaker fees from Medac, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz and UCB; participated in advisory board in AbbVie; and has chaired the steering committee of the Danish Rheumatology Quality Registry (DANBIO, DRQ), which receives public funding from the hospital owners and funding from pharmaceutical companies. MLH co-chairs EuroSpA, which generates real-world evidence of treatment of psoriatic arthritis and axial spondylorthritis based on secondary data and is partly funded by Novartis. TS-I received grants from Amgen and speaker fees from AbbVie, Lipum, Novartis, Pfizer, Nordic Medicine, and UCB. EH received research grants from Research Council of Norway and speaker fees from Novartis and Pfizer and participated in advisory boards in AbbVie and Eli Lilly. LMØ received grants from Novartis and UCB. TU received speaker fees from Pfizer, Galapagos, and UCB and participated in advisory boards in Pfizer and UCB. AK received speaker fees from Finnish Society of Rheumatology and Eli Lilly and support for meeting/travel from AbbVie. SK received research grants from Novartis. MØ received study grants from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Merck, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Novartis, and UCB; received speaker fees from AbbVie, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Hospira, Janssen, MEDAC, Merck, Novartis, Novo, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi and UCB and participated in advisory boards in AbbVie, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Hospira, Janssen, MEDAC, Merck, Novartis, Novo, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, and UCB. RvV received study drug from BMS and UCB; research grants from Alfasigma, BMS, UCB, AstraZeneca, Galapagos, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi; consulting fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Biogen, BMS, Galapagos, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB, GSK, and RemeGen; speaker fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Biogen, BMS, Galapagos, GSK, Janssen, Pfizer, RemeGen, and UCB; and advisory board fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Biogen, BMS, Galapagos, GSK, Janssen, Pfizer, RemeGen, and UCB. ICO received research grants from EU Horizon 2020, EU Horizon Europe, and South-East Norway Regional Authority; received consultancy fees from Dilafor AB and Simplexia AB; participated in advisory board for Oslo University Hospital; and received meeting/travel support from European Medicines Agency and European Clinical Research Infrastructure Network. The remaining authors declared no disclosures.
Similar articles
-
Active conventional treatment and three different biological treatments in early rheumatoid arthritis: phase IV investigator initiated, randomised, observer blinded clinical trial.BMJ. 2020 Dec 2;371:m4328. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4328. BMJ. 2020. PMID: 33268527 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized comparative effectiveness study of oral triple therapy versus etanercept plus methotrexate in early aggressive rheumatoid arthritis: the treatment of Early Aggressive Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial.Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Sep;64(9):2824-35. doi: 10.1002/art.34498. Arthritis Rheum. 2012. PMID: 22508468 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Randomised comparison of combined step-down prednisolone, methotrexate and sulphasalazine with sulphasalazine alone in early rheumatoid arthritis.Lancet. 1997 Aug 2;350(9074):309-18. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)01300-7. Lancet. 1997. PMID: 9251634 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of triple association methotrexate, sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine in early treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with insufficient response to methotrexate: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Joint Bone Spine. 2017 Oct;84(5):563-570. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2016.10.010. Epub 2016 Dec 15. Joint Bone Spine. 2017. PMID: 27989589 Review.
-
[The goal for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis should be remission].Duodecim. 2010;126(12):1457-64. Duodecim. 2010. PMID: 20617749 Review. Finnish.
Cited by
-
Protease activated receptor inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: a new frontier in treatment.Inflammopharmacology. 2025 Jul;33(7):3583-3595. doi: 10.1007/s10787-025-01822-x. Epub 2025 Jun 28. Inflammopharmacology. 2025. PMID: 40580298 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical