PD-L1 imaging with [99mTc]NM-01 SPECT/CT is associated with metabolic response to pembrolizumab with/without chemotherapy in advanced lung cancer
- PMID: 40188291
- PMCID: PMC12081918
- DOI: 10.1038/s41416-025-02991-w
PD-L1 imaging with [99mTc]NM-01 SPECT/CT is associated with metabolic response to pembrolizumab with/without chemotherapy in advanced lung cancer
Abstract
Background: Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry is a predictive biomarker for anti-PD-(L)1 therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It is not a reliable predictor of clinical benefit with non-invasive imaging providing a potential solution. We present the PECan study, the aim of which to assess the relationship of [99mTc]-labeled anti-PD-L1 single-domain antibody (NM-01) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT with metabolic response to anti-PD-(L)1.
Methods: PD-L1 tumour proportion score (TPS) measured using SP263 assay. [99mTc]NM-01 SPECT/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT performed before and 9-weeks following pembrolizumab with/without chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. Tumor (T) to blood pool (BP) maximum region of interest (ROImax) measurements performed in primary and metastatic lesions using SPECT/CT images.
Results: Fifteen patients were included (median age 63 years, 9 male). Intertumoural heterogeneity evident in 10(67%) patients. Mean [99mTc]NM-01 T:BP demonstrated moderate correlation with PD-L1 TPS (r = 0.45, p < 0.05). Depth of [18F]FDG PET/CT metabolic response at 9-weeks (n = 13), correlated strongly with baseline [99mTc]NM-01 T:BP (r = -0.73, p < 0.05), but only moderately with PD-L1 TPS (r = -0.46, p = 0.06).
Conclusion: [99mTc]NM-01 SPECT/CT allows non-invasive quantification of PD-L1 in primary tumour and metastases in NSCLC. [99mTc]NM-01 uptake moderately correlates with PD-L1 immunohistochemistry, determines heterogeneity, and is associated with early metabolic response to anti-PD-1 pembrolizumab.
Clinical trials registration: PD-L1 Expression in Cancer (PECan) study (NCT04436406), registered 18 June 2020 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04436406.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: DJH has received honoraria/speaker fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer and Servier, transport/accommodation grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Servier, Roche and Nanomab Technology (UK) Limited, research funding via institute from Nanomab, and is an executive committee member of the Association of Cancer Physicians (UK). GCh served as an executive director for Nanomab Technology (UK) Limited. JJ has no relevant conflicts of interest. RT has no relevant conflicts of interest. DB has received honoraria/speaker fees from Takeda, Roche, and Pfizer. KA has no relevant conflicts of interest. SE has no relevant conflicts of interest. LKM is a former employee and shareholder of Nanomab, provides consultancy for Nanomab Technology (UK) Limited and is an employee and shareholder of Radiopharm Theranostics Limited. AEBM has received research support via institution from and provided consultancy for Nanomab Technology (UK) Limited. TM has no relevant conflicts of interest. SN has no relevant conflicts of interest. SG has received honoraria/speaker fees from Astrazeneca, Amgen and Chugai, and travel/accommodation grants from Roche. AG has received honoraria/speaker fees from Merck, Amgen, Astrazeneca and Takeda, and travel/accommodation grants from Takeda. SGh has no relevant conflicts of interest. DJ has no relevant conflicts of interest. EK has received honoraria/speaker fees from Takeda, Roche, Pfizer, Janssen and Merck, Sharp &Dohme (MSD), travel/accommodation grants from MSD, has received research funding via institute from MSD and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), and has participated in advisory board(s) with Amgen and MSD. EM has no relevant conflicts of interest. HT is a non-executive director of Nanomab Technology (UK) Limited. JS has no relevant conflicts of interest. VG has no relevant conflicts of interest. GJRC has received research support via institution from Nanomab Technology (UK) Limited, Theragnostics, Serac Healthcare, and provides consultancy for GE Healthcare, Nanomab Technology, Amgen, Blue Earth Diagnostics and Full-Life Technologies. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki (1964) and its later amendments. The study underwent ethics review and was approved by a UK Research Ethics Committee (UK IRAS reference 256684). All patients provided written informed consent. Consent for publication: Written informed consent to participate and publication was required for this study as per UK Research Ethics Committee and Health Research Authority (IRAS reference 256684).
Figures




References
-
- Reck M, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Robinson AG, Hui R, Csöszi T, Fülöp A, et al. Updated Analysis of KEYNOTE-024: Pembrolizumab Versus Platinum-Based Chemotherapy for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score of 50% or Greater. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:537–46. - PubMed
-
- Mok TSK, Wu YL, Kudaba I, Kowalski DM, Chul Cho B, Turna HZ, et al. Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for previously untreated, PD-L1-expressing, locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-042): a randomised, open-label, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019;393:1819–30. - PubMed
-
- Gandhi L, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Gadgeel S, Esteban E, Felip E, De Angelis F, et al. Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:2078–92. - PubMed
-
- de Castro G Jr., Kudaba I, Wu YL, Lopes G, Kowalski DM, Turna HZ, et al. Five-Year Outcomes With Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Programmed Death Ligand-1 Tumor Proportion Score ≥ 1% in the KEYNOTE-042 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41:1986–91. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Research Materials