Impact of an intraoral X-ray cone with positioning laser lights on reducing radiographic errors with the bisecting angle technique: A technical report
- PMID: 40191394
- PMCID: PMC11966014
- DOI: 10.5624/isd.20240196
Impact of an intraoral X-ray cone with positioning laser lights on reducing radiographic errors with the bisecting angle technique: A technical report
Abstract
Purpose: The bisecting angle technique (BAT) encounters difficulties in positioning the X-ray cone and aligning the central beam with the tooth. To address this, a rectangular laser featuring a pointed light was integrated into the intraoral X-ray cone. This study evaluated its effectiveness in improving radiograph quality and minimizing errors.
Materials and methods: Fifty fifth-year Bachelor of Dental Surgery students were divided into 3 groups. Group 1 (n=16) used the paralleling technique, group 2 (n=17) employed the conventional BAT, and group 3 (n=17) utilized the laser-assisted BAT on mannequins. Two independent oral radiologists assessed the quality of the radiographs, categorizing the images as either diagnostically acceptable or not acceptable. Inter-group comparisons of quality and error rates were conducted using the chi-square test (significance level: P<0.05).
Results: The paralleling technique group produced 77.5% diagnostically acceptable radiographs and 22.5% that were not diagnostically acceptable. These percentages were 65.3% and 34.7%, respectively, in the conventional BAT group and 75.3% and 24.7%, respectively, in the laser-assisted BAT group, showing results similar to the paralleling technique group. The quality of radiographs differed significantly among the groups (P<0.05). The percentage of error-free radiographs was 38.1% in the paralleling technique group, 20.6% in the conventional BAT group, and 40.0% in the laser-assisted BAT group, with these differences being statistically significant (P<0.05).
Conclusion: The device produced higher acceptability and fewer radiographic errors than the conventional BAT technique, suggesting accurate adjustment of the X-ray cone and central beam to the desired teeth.
Keywords: Dental Radiography; Lasers; Technique, X-rays.
Copyright © 2025 by Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None
Figures

References
-
- Drage N, Atkin P, Farnell D. Dental and maxillofacial radiology: confidence, knowledge and skills in the newly graduated dentist. Br Dent J. 2020;228:546–550. - PubMed
-
- Mauriello SM, Tang Q, Johnson KB, Hadgraft HH, Platin E. A comparison of technique errors using two radiographic intra-oral receptor-holding devices. J Dent Hyg. 2015;89:384–389. - PubMed
-
- Taguchi M, Wamasing P, Watanabe H, Sakamoto J, Kurabayashi T. Applying the paralleling technique in intraoral periapical radiographs for Japanese patients by analyzing CT images. Oral Radiol. 2021;37:311–320. - PubMed
-
- Yeung A, Tanaka R, Jacobs R, Bornstein M. Awareness and practice of 2D and 3D diagnostic imaging among dentists in Hong Kong. Br Dent J. 2020;228:701–709. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources