Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1985 May;39(3):193-202.

A comparison of two methods of milk sampling for calculating the fat intake of breast-fed babies

  • PMID: 4019266
Clinical Trial

A comparison of two methods of milk sampling for calculating the fat intake of breast-fed babies

A F Williams et al. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr. 1985 May.

Abstract

Fat intake at a breast feed was estimated by either sampling milk intermittently during the feed using a thin latex nipple shield ('shield method') or by expressing samples before and after the feed ('expression method'). These sampling techniques were compared within 30 mother/infant pairs using a randomized cross-over design. Mean fat intake estimated by the expression method was significantly greater than that estimated by the shield method (first breast P less than 0.0001, second breast P less than 0.002). This finding was partly explained by a significantly lower mean milk intake when the nipple shield was used, but the higher fat content of expressed milk samples compared to samples obtained during suckling also played a part. Use of the nipple shield confirmed that breast-milk fat content does not change in a predictable way during a feed. Nevertheless, for practical purposes, the advantages of studying changes in milk composition during the feed have to be set against the potential restrictive effect of the nipple shield system when it is used to sample intermittently during the feed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types