Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr;36(4):e70085.
doi: 10.1111/pai.70085.

Evaluation of diagnostic tests for immediate-type allergic reactions to amide group local anesthetics in children

Affiliations

Evaluation of diagnostic tests for immediate-type allergic reactions to amide group local anesthetics in children

Sinem Aslan et al. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2025 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Local anesthetics (LAs) are widely utilized to provide analgesia in minor surgical interventions. Although patients are frequently referred for suspected LA allergies in clinical practice, confirmed cases of immediate-type hypersensitivity remain rare. This study aims to establish an optimal diagnostic protocol for immediate-type LA allergy in children and to assess the practicality and reliability of an alternative diagnostic approach for hypersensitivity testing of amide-type local anesthetics.

Methods: The medical records of patients diagnosed with suspected immediate-type reactions to LAs administered by pediatric dentists between January 2019 and August 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. All children underwent a skin prick test (SPT), followed if negative by an intradermal test (IDT) at a 1:10 dilution. If intradermal testing was also negative, a subcutaneous provocation test was subsequently performed.

Results: A total of 88 patients (47 boys, 41 girls), with a mean age of 8.5 ± 3.5 years, were included. In most cases (n = 59, 67%), the suspected LA was unidentified. Among the known agents, articaine (n = 18, 20.5%) and lidocaine (n = 11, 12.5%) were the most frequently reported. IDT results were positive in 11 patients (12.5%), with articaine in 8 cases (61.5%), prilocaine in 3 cases (23%), and lidocaine in 2 cases (15.5%). Intradermal testing at a 1:10 dilution demonstrated a high negative predictive value (99%) for immediate-type reactions.

Conclusion: For the diagnosis of immediate-type LA allergy, including cases with a history of anaphylaxis, an IDT at a 1:10 dilution following a negative SPT, followed by subcutaneous provocation, may serve as a time-efficient and reliable diagnostic strategy.

Keywords: allergy; children; intradermal test; local anesthetic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Diagnostic Testing Protocol for Local Anesthetic Allergy. LA, Local anesthetic.

Similar articles

References

    1. Eggleston ST, Lush LW. Understanding allergic reactions to local anesthetics. Ann Pharmacother. 1996;30(7–8):851‐857. - PubMed
    1. Jiang S, Tang M. Allergy to local anesthetics is a rarity: review of diagnostics and strategies for clinical management. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2023;64(2):193‐205. - PubMed
    1. Zhao W. Allergy in perioperative setting. Allergy Med. 2024;2:100009.
    1. Kvisselgaard AD, Kroigaard M, Mosbech HF, Garvey LH. No cases of perioperative allergy to local anesthestics in the Danish Anaesthesia allergy Centre. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2017;61:149‐155. - PubMed
    1. Bhole MV, Manson AL, Seneviratne SL, Misbah SA. IgE mediated allergy to local anaesthetics: seperating fact from perception: a UK perspective. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108(6):903‐911. - PubMed