Intraocular lens power calculation in pediatric cataract surgery: A narrative review
- PMID: 40193670
- PMCID: PMC11977731
- DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042072
Intraocular lens power calculation in pediatric cataract surgery: A narrative review
Abstract
Congenital cataract is a lens opacification that disrupts normal visual development, requiring early surgical intervention to prevent amblyopia. In children, timely surgery, followed by optical correction and vision rehabilitation, is crucial for achieving binocular vision with foveal fixation. The recommended surgical timing is within 8 weeks for unilateral cases and by 4 months for bilateral cases to minimize long-term visual impairment. Despite advancements in intraocular lens (IOL) technology and ophthalmic microsurgery, accurate IOL power selection in pediatric patients remains a challenge due to axial length growth, biometric variability, and the reliance on formulas derived from adult models. These factors contribute to postoperative refractive errors, making proper formula selection essential in minimizing additional corrective interventions. Traditional third-generation formulas, such as the Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraff-T and Holladay 1, are commonly used in pediatric cases. However, recent studies suggest that Barrett Universal II offers greater accuracy in older children, owing to its advanced vergence-based algorithm and improved axial length prediction. Emerging formulas, including Hill-RBF 3.0 and Kane, show promise but require further validation in pediatric cohorts. Additionally, ocular growth dynamics must be accounted for when determining postoperative refractive targets. Younger children often require undercorrection to compensate for axial elongation, and biometric formulas must be chosen accordingly to optimize long-term outcomes. The lack of pediatric-specific formulas further complicates IOL selection, emphasizing the need for new models that integrate machine learning algorithms and growth prediction data.
Keywords: aphakia; children; congenital cataract; intraocular lens; pseudophakia.
Copyright © 2025 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.
Similar articles
-
Pediatric IOL power calculation: Factors and considerations.Indian J Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar 1;73(3):312-319. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1205_24. Epub 2025 Feb 26. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2025. PMID: 40007266 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluation of IOL power calculation with the Kane formula for pediatric cataract surgery.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Sep;260(9):2877-2885. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05779-3. Epub 2022 Jul 27. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022. PMID: 35895106
-
Algorithmic intraocular lens power calculation formula selection by keratometry, anterior chamber depth and axial length.Acta Ophthalmol. 2022 May;100(3):e701-e709. doi: 10.1111/aos.14956. Epub 2021 Aug 11. Acta Ophthalmol. 2022. PMID: 34378871 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of 9 modern intraocular lens power calculation formulas for a quadrifocal intraocular lens.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Aug;44(8):942-948. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.05.021. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018. PMID: 30115296
-
Intraocular Lens Power Formulas, Biometry, and Intraoperative Aberrometry: A Review.Ophthalmology. 2021 Nov;128(11):e94-e114. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.08.010. Epub 2020 Aug 13. Ophthalmology. 2021. PMID: 32798526 Review.
References
-
- Chen J, Chen Y, Zhong Y, Li J. Comparison of visual acuity and complications between primary IOL implantation and aphakia in patients with congenital cataract younger than 2 years: a meta-analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46:465–73. - PubMed
-
- El Fkih L, Hmaied W, El Hif S, et al. . Congenital cataract etiology. Tunis Med. 2007;85:1025–9. - PubMed
-
- Mets MB. Eye manifestations of intrauterine infections. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2001;14:521–31. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical