Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Apr 4;104(14):e42072.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042072.

Intraocular lens power calculation in pediatric cataract surgery: A narrative review

Affiliations
Review

Intraocular lens power calculation in pediatric cataract surgery: A narrative review

Bogumiła Wójcik-Niklewska et al. Medicine (Baltimore). .

Abstract

Congenital cataract is a lens opacification that disrupts normal visual development, requiring early surgical intervention to prevent amblyopia. In children, timely surgery, followed by optical correction and vision rehabilitation, is crucial for achieving binocular vision with foveal fixation. The recommended surgical timing is within 8 weeks for unilateral cases and by 4 months for bilateral cases to minimize long-term visual impairment. Despite advancements in intraocular lens (IOL) technology and ophthalmic microsurgery, accurate IOL power selection in pediatric patients remains a challenge due to axial length growth, biometric variability, and the reliance on formulas derived from adult models. These factors contribute to postoperative refractive errors, making proper formula selection essential in minimizing additional corrective interventions. Traditional third-generation formulas, such as the Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraff-T and Holladay 1, are commonly used in pediatric cases. However, recent studies suggest that Barrett Universal II offers greater accuracy in older children, owing to its advanced vergence-based algorithm and improved axial length prediction. Emerging formulas, including Hill-RBF 3.0 and Kane, show promise but require further validation in pediatric cohorts. Additionally, ocular growth dynamics must be accounted for when determining postoperative refractive targets. Younger children often require undercorrection to compensate for axial elongation, and biometric formulas must be chosen accordingly to optimize long-term outcomes. The lack of pediatric-specific formulas further complicates IOL selection, emphasizing the need for new models that integrate machine learning algorithms and growth prediction data.

Keywords: aphakia; children; congenital cataract; intraocular lens; pseudophakia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

Similar articles

References

    1. Chen J, Chen Y, Zhong Y, Li J. Comparison of visual acuity and complications between primary IOL implantation and aphakia in patients with congenital cataract younger than 2 years: a meta-analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46:465–73. - PubMed
    1. Wu X, Long E, Lin H, Liu Y. Prevalence and epidemiological characteristics of congenital cataract: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:28564. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Medsinge A, Nischal KK. Pediatric cataract: challenges and future directions. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:77–90. - PMC - PubMed
    1. El Fkih L, Hmaied W, El Hif S, et al. . Congenital cataract etiology. Tunis Med. 2007;85:1025–9. - PubMed
    1. Mets MB. Eye manifestations of intrauterine infections. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2001;14:521–31. - PubMed