Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 2;39(7):736-744.
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000005115.

Effects of High-Intensity Progressive Resistance Training Combined With Self-Talk on Muscle Strength and Functional Performance in Older Adults

Affiliations

Effects of High-Intensity Progressive Resistance Training Combined With Self-Talk on Muscle Strength and Functional Performance in Older Adults

Vittoria Ferrando et al. J Strength Cond Res. .

Abstract

Ferrando, V, Mirabelli, F, Panascì, M, Sofrà, D, Ruggeri, P, Faelli, E, and Bisio, A. Effects of high-intensity progressive resistance training combined with self-talk on muscle strength and functional performance in older adults. J Strength Cond Res 39(7): 736-744, 2025-In older people, muscle mass and functional capacity decline, affecting balance, and gait control. In this population, resistance training (RT) improves muscle strength, counteracting this physiological decline. In younger individuals, cognitive strategies like motivational self-talk have been successfully integrated with RT to enhance its effectiveness. This study aimed to compare the effects of a high-intensity progressive RT with positive motivational self-talk against RT alone on muscle strength and functional performance in older adults. Twenty-eight healthy older people were divided into resistance training self-talk (RT-ST) group and RT group. The RT-ST group mentally repeated positive motivational phrases during lower-limb exercises, whereas the other group performed RT alone. The 4-week protocol included biweekly sessions, consisting of warm-up, a high-intensity resistance exercise, and cooldown. Handgrip strength, 1 repetition maximum (1RM), 30-second chair stand (30 s-CS), and time up and go (TUG) tests were conducted before (PRE), immediately after (POST), and 2 weeks after follow-up (FU) of the intervention. One repetition maximum significantly increased from PRE to POST ( p ≤ 0.001) and FU ( p ≤ 0.05) in both groups. The 30 s-CS significantly improved only in the RT-ST group at FU ( p ≤ 0.001), with higher values compared with the RT group at POST ( p ≤ 0.05) and FU ( p ≤ 0.05). Time up and go test duration decreased in both groups ( p ≤ 0.001), with RT-ST completing the test faster than RT ( p ≤ 0.05). Incorporating positive motivational self-talk into a high-intensity progressive RT program led to significant improvements in functional performance, suggesting that its benefits go beyond improving muscle strength and may positively impact the activities of daily living in older adults.

Keywords: elderly; incremental load; mobility capacity; motivation; strategy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
A) Subjects underwent a preliminary interview in which they received explanation about the training and signed the informed consent. Before (PRE), after (POST) intervention period and after 2 weeks (follow-up, FU), subjects underwent to 1 repetition maximum (1RM), handgrip strength (HGS), time up and go (TUG), and 30-seconds chair stand (30 s-CS) tests. B) Both resistance training self-talk (RT-ST) and resistance training (RT) intervention period lasted 4 weeks (2 times/week); each session consisted of: warm-up, resistance phase during which subjects performed exercises on leg press, leg extension and multipower machines, and cool-down. The table at the bottom of the figure shows the training load in each group.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Results of the 30-second chair stand (30 s-CS) (A) and time up and go (TUG) (B) tests. Red and blue circles refer to single-data values of subjects in the RT-ST and RT group, respectively. In (A) the horizontal line indicates the median values, and the bars represent the inter-quartile ranges in 30 s-CS, whereas in (B) the horizontal line indicates mean values, and the bars show the standard error. *Indicates difference within group; ***p < 0.001. Differences between the groups are indicated by the #symbol; #p < 0.05; ##p < 0.01.

References

    1. Beijersbergen CMI, Granacher U, Vandervoort AA, DeVita P, Hortobágyi T. The biomechanical mechanism of how strength and power training improves walking speed in old adults remains unknown. Ageing Res Rev 12: 618–627, 2013. - PubMed
    1. Bell L, Ruddock A, Maden-Wilkinson T, Rogerson D. Overreaching and overtraining in strength sports and resistance training: A scoping review. J Sports Sci 38: 1897–1912, 2020. - PubMed
    1. Billot M, Calvani R, Urtamo A, et al. Preserving mobility in older adults with physical frailty and sarcopenia: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations for physical activity interventions. Clin Interv Aging 15: 1675–1690, 2020. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bisio A, Bove M. Cognitive strategies to enhance motor performance: Examples of applying action observation, motor imagery and psyching-up techniques. In: Handbook of Sport Neuroscience and Psychophysiology. Carlstedt R, Balconi M, eds. New York, 2018.
    1. Blanchfield AW, Hardy J, De Morree HM, Staiano W, Marcora SM. Talking yourself out of exhaustion: The effects of self-talk on endurance performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 46: 998–1007, 2014. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources