WHO ICOPE Programme Adherence of 8672 Older Age People Over 2-Years of Follow-Up
- PMID: 40195235
- PMCID: PMC12371806
- DOI: 10.1111/jan.16740
WHO ICOPE Programme Adherence of 8672 Older Age People Over 2-Years of Follow-Up
Abstract
Aim: To compare the characteristics of participants who discontinued prematurely with those who remained in the ICOPE program (Integrated Care for Older PEople) in France and to compare completely adherent participants with partially adherent ones after 2 years of follow-up.
Design: Retrospective observational study.
Methods: We analysed the data of older age people participating during 2 years from the ICOPE MONITOR database. The study compared the population that discontinued follow-up with the population currently in follow-up. Among the population in follow-up, a comparison was made between the completely adherent and partially adherent populations.
Results: In total, 8672 participants had a follow-up period of at least 2 years. After 2 years, three-quarters of the participants were still in follow-up with varying levels of adherence. Participants who discontinued follow-up are older and had more compromised Step 1 levels across all domains of intrinsic capacity (IC). Partially adherent participants were older and generally more compromised in IC than completely adherent participants. Those participants least adherent to ICOPE presented higher declines in clinical parameters.
Conclusion: Among autonomous older age people, the most impaired in intrinsic capacity domains and aged participants were more likely to discontinue follow-up, highlighting the need to focus efforts on this group. On the other hand, younger robust and healthier older age people represent a good target for ICOPE program, in terms of adherence and primary prevention.
Reported method: EQUATOR guidelines: STROBE.
Patient of public contribution: No patient or public contribution.
Keywords: ICOPE program; gerontology; older people; primary care; quantitative approaches.
© 2025 The Author(s). Journal of Advanced Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Database complies with data confidentiality and security requirements in accordance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and has been validated by the National Commission on Informatics and Liberties (CNIL) in 2017 (registration number 247169284s, reference MMS/OSS/NDT171027). After evaluation and validation by the data protection officer and according to the GDPR, this study completed all the criteria, and it is registered in the register of data study of the Toulouse Hospital (number's register: RnIPH 2023–122) and covered by the MR‐004. There is a statistician on the author team and state which author.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Dapp, U. , Anders J., von Renteln‐Kruse W., and Meier‐Baumgartner H. P.. 2005. “Active Health Promotion in Old Age: Methodology of a Preventive Intervention Programme Provided by an Interdisciplinary Health Advisory Team for Independent Older People.” Journal of Public Health 13, no. 3: 122–127.
-
- Dapp, U. , Anders J. A. M., von Renteln‐Kruse W., et al. 2011. “A Randomized Trial of Effects of Health Risk Appraisal Combined With Group Sessions or Home Visits on Preventive Behaviors in Older Adults.” Journals of Gerontology: Series A 66A, no. 5: 591–598. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
