The association between statin use, genetic variation, and prostate cancer risk
- PMID: 40195554
- DOI: 10.1038/s41391-025-00964-x
The association between statin use, genetic variation, and prostate cancer risk
Abstract
Background: The association between statin medication use and prostate cancer remains inconclusive. Evidence shows that genetic variation modifies lipid-lowering efficacy of statins, however, there are limited data on the pharmacogenomics of statins in prostate cancer chemoprevention.
Methods: Clinical and germline data were extracted from the prostate biopsy database at the University Health Network, Toronto, Canada (1996-2014). A genome-wide association study (GWAS) and a custom array of 54 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) related to statin metabolism were performed. Using a case-control design, we examined the associations between statin use and overall and high-grade (Grade Group ≥2) prostate cancer risk. A case-only design was employed to explore interactions between candidate/GWAS SNPs and the statin-cancer association.
Results: Among 3481 patients, 1104 (32%) were using statins at biopsy. Statin users were older and had higher body mass index, greater number of positive cores, and higher Gleason scores. In total, 2061 participants (59%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer, with 922 cases (45%) classified as high-grade. When adjusted for baseline characteristics, the use of statins was not associated with decreased risk of overall or high-grade prostate cancer. Two unique SNPs implicated in statin metabolism showed significant interaction with the statin-cancer association. In particular, statin users harboring the GG genotype (n = 668; 24%) of rs10276036 had significantly lower prostate cancer risk (HR 0.71, 95% CI 051-1.00). However, none of the SNPs achieved genome-wide significance.
Conclusions: In our study, statin use was not associated with either prostate cancer or high-grade prostate cancer risk. While one candidate SNP that influences statin metabolism may be associated with a lower cancer risk among statin users and thus warrants further study, neither this nor any other SNPs achieved genome-wide significance. Thus, our findings do not add evidence in support of a prostate cancer chemopreventive role for statins.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study protocol was approved by the University Health Network Research Ethics Board (REB#13-6476). All participants signed a written informed consent prior to entering the study.
Similar articles
-
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1:CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3. PMID: 29271481 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 23;5:CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub5. PMID: 33871055 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Sertindole for schizophrenia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005. PMID: 16034864 Free PMC article.
-
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450. Health Technol Assess. 2007. PMID: 17999840
-
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340. Health Technol Assess. 2006. PMID: 16959170
References
-
- Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, Colombet M, Mery L, Piñeros M, et al. Cancer tomorrow. 2021. Global Cancer Observatory: cancer today. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2020.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources