Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 5;80(6):glaf071.
doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaf071.

Validation of the Candrive Older Driver Risk Stratification Tool for Assessing Medical Fitness-to-Drive in Older Australian Drivers

Affiliations

Validation of the Candrive Older Driver Risk Stratification Tool for Assessing Medical Fitness-to-Drive in Older Australian Drivers

Judith L Charlton et al. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. .

Abstract

Background: Assessing older drivers' fitness-to-drive is challenging, with decisions impacting mobility and health. This study aimed to validate the Candrive older driver risk stratification tool for screening medical fitness-to-drive in an independent cohort of older adults from the Ozcandrive 8-year prospective study.

Methods: A convenience sample of drivers aged 75 and older residing in Melbourne, Australia completed the Candrive assessments. Their vehicles were instrumented to collect vehicle and global positioning system data, including trip distance. The first 4 years of Ozcandrive data were analyzed. The primary outcome measure was self-reported at-fault collisions, adjusted per 10 000 km driven. Collision risk status was modeled using Generalized Estimating Equations with Poisson regression using predetermined Candrive risk stratification tool predictor variables.

Results: A total of 257 older drivers (70.8% male) were recruited with an average age at study enrollment of 79.7 years (standard deviation = 3.5). Of the 755 adjusted person-years of driving, 74.1% were in the Low risk category (vs original sample, Candrive: 74.8%) and 10.5% were in the Low-Medium risk category (Candrive: 9.3%). Only 15.4% were in the Medium-High risk category (Candrive: 15.9%), where the relative risk for self-reported at-fault collisions was 1.79 (95% confidence interval = 1.06-3.03) compared to the Low risk category.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates an association between self-reported at-fault collisions and Candrive risk stratification tool scores. This result is promising given the primary outcome measure differed from the original Candrive study that used police-reported, at-fault collisions, and supports Candrive risk stratification tool's use by healthcare providers when initiating fitness-to-drive conversations.

Keywords: Driving issues; Geriatric assessment; Medical fitness-to-drive; Primary care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

J.L.C. serves as Chair of the National Road Safety Partnership Program. S.K. serves as a Board Member of the Association of the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. M.B. was supported by a Canada Research Chair in Aging and Health during the development phase of the Candrive study. G.N. was supported by the George, Margaret and Gary Hunt Family Chair in Geriatric Medicine, University of Toronto, received a grant from the Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging and served as Chair for the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Institute on Aging Advisory Board. M.R. was supported by the Sunnybrook Psychiatry Partnership, received grants or contracts from the Canadian Institute of Health Research, Canadian Consortium of Neurodegeneration and Aging, and Centre for Brain Health Innovation, participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for a study on multiple sclerosis and exercise, and served as Program Director for Geriatric Psychiatry at the University of Toronto. M.M.P. received grants or contracts from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, Natural Science and Engineering Research Council, Aging Gracefully across Environments using Technology to Support Wellness, Engagement and Long Life Networks of Centres of Excellence Inc., Canadian Institutes of Health Research, New Horizons for Seniors Program, Winnipeg Foundation, Riverview Health Centre Foundation, Mitacs, University Research Grants Program and served as Chair of the Board for Transportation Options Network for Seniors in Manitoba. The other authors declare no conflict.

References

    1. Beard JR, Officer AM, Cassels AK. The world report on ageing and health. Gerontologist. 2016;56(suppl 2):S163–S166. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw037 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ragland D, Satariano W, MacLeod L. Reasons given by older people for limitation or avoidance of driving. The Gerontologist. 2004;44(2):237–244. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/44.2.237 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marottoli RA, de Leon CFM, Glass TA, Williams CS, Cooney JLM, Berkman LF. Consequences of driving cessation decreased out-of-home activity levels. J Gerontol B. 2000;55(6):S334–S340. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/55.6.S334 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marshall SC. The role of reduced fitness to drive due to medical impairments in explaining crashes involving older drivers. Traffic Inj Prev. 2008;9(4):291–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389580801895244 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mathias JL, Lucas LK. Cognitive predictors of unsafe driving in older drivers: a meta-analysis. Int Psychogeriatr. 2009;21(4):637–653. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610209009119 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types