Design Factors Affecting the Fixation of Cervical Disc Replacements: A Biomechanical Analysis
- PMID: 40195762
- DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005353
Design Factors Affecting the Fixation of Cervical Disc Replacements: A Biomechanical Analysis
Abstract
Study design: Biomechanical study.
Purpose: The goal of the present study is to explore the connection between various cervical disc replacement designs and the overarching risk of migration.
Background: Migration of cervical disc replacements has become an increasingly prevalent complication in clinical use. Despite this, there is a lack of biomechanical studies addressing the relationship between implant design and migration.
Materials and methods: Five cervical disc replacement designs were tested in rigid polyurethane models. Before testing, each device had measurements taken of important features: endplate surface roughness, extruding keel/fin heights, device height, ball contact arc, and coverage angle. Each device was subjected to 10,000 cycles of all spinal rotations, and a combined loading pattern of all 3 rotations was applied simultaneously. Sagittal and coronal plane micromotions at the bone-implant interface were continuously measured through all testing. Micromotions were then compared as a function of device design, loading type, and specific fixation features.
Results: Overall, one ball-and-socket device, the PCM, had larger cyclic micromotions than all other devices during flexion/extension and lateral bending ( P <0.06). A different ball-and-socket device, the Prestige-ST, had larger overall migrations in the sagittal plane during axial rotation ( P <0.01). When comparing specific device features, trends were identified for three variables: keel/fin height, ball contact arc, and coverage angle. A smaller keel/fin and coverage angle and a larger ball contact arc were associated with an increase in micromotion ( P <0.05, <0.01, <0.01, respectively).
Conclusions: This study presents the first quantification of micromotion, representing initial fixation, in cervical disc arthroplasty. Further, findings were generally consistent with clinical literature regarding device migration. This study has identified device-specific trends that may influence micromotion in vivo. These findings or methodology can be utilized to identify successful devices for patients or offer valuable insights into future cervical disc designs.
Keywords: cervical disc replacement; device features; fixation; migration.
Copyright © 2025 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Payment from OrthoFix and DePuy was received to the corresponding author’s institution forresearch studies a research grant unrelated to the present work. The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Khan MQ, Prim MD, Alexopoulos G, Kemp JM, Mercier PJ. Cervical disc arthroplasty migration following mechanical intubation: a case presentation and review of the literature. World Neurosurg. 2020;144:244–249.
-
- Li J, Liang L, Ye X, Qi M, Chen H, Yuan W. Cervical arthroplasty with Discover prosthesis: clinical outcomes and analysis of factors that may influence postoperative range of motion. Eur Spine J. 2013;22:2303–2309.
-
- Ozbek Z, Ozkara E, Arslantaş A. Implant migration in cervical disk arthroplasty. World Neurosurg. 2017;97:390–397.
-
- Pitsika M, Nissen J. Spinal cord compression due to nucleus migration from Mobi-C total disc replacement. Br J Neurosurg. 2022;36:520–523.
-
- Postak PD, Heim CS, Morra EA, Greenwald AS. Clinical retrieval and simulator comparison of an investigational cervical disc replacement: an a priori requirement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(suppl 2):68–73.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
