Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 6;8(4):e70563.
doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70563. eCollection 2025 Apr.

Impact of Immersive Virtual Reality During Outpatient Sedation-Free Colonoscopy: A Randomized Prospective Controlled Study

Affiliations

Impact of Immersive Virtual Reality During Outpatient Sedation-Free Colonoscopy: A Randomized Prospective Controlled Study

Myriam Ayari et al. Health Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Background and aims: Colonoscopy is the gold standard for accurate exploration of the colon. Thus, it must be performed as efficiently as possible. The patient's tolerance considerably affects the quality of sedation free examinations. Pharmacological sedation can solve this issue; however, it can expose to significant adverse events. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of immersive virtual reality (VR) during sedation-free colonoscopy.

Methods: We conducted a prospective controlled study including outpatients presenting for unsedated colonoscopy. Patients were randomized into Group 1: colonoscopy with VR headset and Group 2: without intervention. Anxiety, comfort, and pain were respectively evaluated by State-Trait Anxiety inventory (STAI), Gloucester scale and the verbal rating scale (VRS).

Results: In total, 63 patients were included: intervention group G1 (n = 33) and control group G2 (n = 30). A slightly lower time to caecal intubation was noted in the intervention group without significant difference (G1 = 19 min vs. G2 = 26 min, p = 0.07). Patients with VR mask expressed lower levels of post-procedural anxiety than those in the control group (mean STAI G1 = 47 vs. G2 = 53, p < 0.01) and a significant decrease in the STAI score compared to pre-endoscopy values (8 vs. 4 points, p < 0.01). The per-procedural pain assessed by VRS was significantly lower in the patients using VR (Mean G1 = 0.44 vs. G2 = 1.32, p < 0.01). Moreover, endoscopic examination was found to be more comfortable with VR based on the Gloucester scale p < 0.01.

Conclusions: Immersive VR technology is a promising, noninvasive and well-accepted tool for improving tolerance by reducing colonoscopy induced pain and anxiety allowing an optimized examination.

Keywords: anxiety; colonoscopy; comfort; immersion; pain; virtual reality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT flow diagram of the study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A graph comparing outcomes between the two groups. STAI, State‐Trait Anxiety Inventory; VRS, verbal rating scale.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Robertson D. J., Lieberman D. A., Winawer S. J., et al., “Colorectal Cancers Soon After Colonoscopy: A Pooled Multicohort Analysis,” Gut 63, no. 6 (2014): 949–956. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harewood G. C., Wiersema M. J., and Melton J. L., “A Prospective, Controlled Assessment of Factors Influencing Acceptance of Screening Colonoscopy,” American Journal of Gastroenterology 97, no. 12 (2002): 3186–3194. - PubMed
    1. Dossa F., Dubé C., Tinmouth J., et al., “Practice Recommendations for the Use of Sedation in Routine Hospital‐Based Colonoscopy,” BMJ Open Gastroenterology 7, no. 1 (2020): e000348. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wernli K. J., Brenner A. T., Rutter C. M., and Inadomi J. M., “Risks Associated With Anesthesia Services During Colonoscopy,” Gastroenterology 150, no. 4 (2016): 888–894. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hsueh F. C., Chen C. M., Sun C. A., Chou Y. C., Hsiao S. M., and Yang T., “A Study on the Effects of a Health Education Intervention on Anxiety and Pain During Colonoscopy Procedures,” Journal of Nursing Research 24, no. 2 (2016): 181–189. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources