Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 21;11(3):e42156.
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42156. eCollection 2025 Feb 15.

The stage- and subgroup-specific impact of non-HLA polymorphisms on preclinical type 1 diabetes progression

Affiliations

The stage- and subgroup-specific impact of non-HLA polymorphisms on preclinical type 1 diabetes progression

Julie Vandewalle et al. Heliyon. .

Abstract

Besides variation within the HLA gene complex determining a major part of genetic susceptibility to Type 1 diabetes, genome-wide association studies have identified over 60 non-HLA loci also contributing to disease risk. While individual single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have limited predictive power, genetic risk scores (GRS) can identify at-risk individuals. However, current models do not fully capture the heterogeneous progression of asymptomatic islet autoimmunity, especially in autoantibody-positive subjects. In this study, we investigated the additional stage-specific impact of 17 non-HLA loci on previously established prediction models in 448 persistently autoantibody-positive first-degree relatives. Cox regression and Kaplan Meier survival analysis were used to assess their influence on progression from single to multiple autoantibody-positivity, and from there to clinical onset. FUT2 and CTSH significantly accelerated progression of single to multiple autoAb-positivity, but only in presence of insulin autoantibodies and HLA-DQ2/DQ8, respectively. At the stage of multiple autoantibody-positivity, progression to clinical onset was impacted by various non-HLA SNPs either as independent predictors (GLIS3, CENPW, IL2, GSDM, MEG3A, and NRP-1) or through interaction with HLA class I alleles (CLEC16A, NRP-1, TCF7L2), maternal diabetes status (CTSH), or a high-risk autoantibody-profile (CD226). Our data indicate that, unlike for GRS, the weight of distinct non-HLA polymorphisms varies significantly among individuals at risk, depending on disease stage and other stage-specific risk factors. They refine our previous stage-specific prediction models including age, autoantibody-profile, HLA genotype, and other non-HLA SNPs, and emphasize the importance of stratifying accordingly to personalize time-to-event prediction in risk groups, or for preparing or interpreting prevention trials.

Keywords: Autoimmunity; Non-HLA SNPs; Prediabetes; Prediction; Type 1 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Interaction effects of non-HLA SNPs on progression of single to multiple autoAb-positivity. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of progression from single to multiple autoAb-positivity for FDRs with (red) or without (blue) FUT2 CC according to the presence (A) or absence (B) of IAA as first autoAb; CTSH CC according to the presence (C) or absence (D) of HLA-DQ2/DQ8; and the absence of genotypes CTLA4 AG and CTSH CC (green), the presence of only one of these genotypes (blue), and the presence of both genotypes (red), in HLA-DQ2/DQ8+ (E) and HLA-DQ2/DQ8- (F) relatives. P-values (p) are from the log-rank test on differences in survival. The numbers of individuals at risk are indicated below the time axis. For each arm, the genotype and number (cases/events) are shown in the legend.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Independent effects of non-HLA SNPs on progression from multiple autoAb-positivity to clinical onset. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for FDRs with (red) or without (blue) CENPW CC (A), IL2 AG (B), GSDM CT (C), GLIS3 CC (D), NRP-1 AA (E) or MEG3A AA (F) genotype. P-values (p) are from the log-rank test on differences in survival. The numbers of individuals at risk are indicated below the time axis. For each arm, the genotype and number (cases/events) are shown above the graph.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Interaction effects of non-HLA SNPs on progression from multiple autoAb-positivity to clinical onset. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for HLA-A∗24 positive (A,C) or negative (B,D) FDRs with (red) or without (blue) NRP-1 AA (A,B) or TCF7L2 CC (C,D) genotype, and for FDRs with (red) or without (blue) CLEC16A GG, according to the presence (E) or absence (F) of for HLA-B∗18. P-values (p) are from the log-rank test on differences in survival. The numbers of individuals at risk are indicated below the time axis. For each arm, the genotype and number (cases/events) are shown above the graph.

Similar articles

References

    1. Barrett J.C., et al. Genome-wide association study and meta-analysis find that over 40 loci affect risk of type 1 diabetes. Nat. Genet. 2009;41(6):703–707. doi: 10.1038/ng.381. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cooper J.D., et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association study data identifies additional type 1 diabetes risk loci. Nat. Genet. 2008;40(12):1399–1401. doi: 10.1038/ng.249. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pociot F., et al. Genetics of type 1 diabetes: what's next? Diabetes. 2010;59(7):1561–1571. doi: 10.2337/db10-0076. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wellcome Trust Case Control, C. Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature. 2007;447(7145):661–678. doi: 10.1038/nature05911. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Onengut-Gumuscu S., et al. Type 1 diabetes risk in african-ancestry participants and utility of an ancestry-specific genetic risk score. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(3):406–415. doi: 10.2337/dc18-1727. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources