The San Diego Consensus for Laryngopharyngeal Symptoms and Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease
- PMID: 40197644
- PMCID: PMC12353988
- DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003482
The San Diego Consensus for Laryngopharyngeal Symptoms and Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease
Abstract
Introduction: The term laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is frequently applied to aerodigestive symptoms despite lack of objective reflux evidence. The aim of this initiative was to develop a modern care paradigm for LPR supported by otolaryngology and gastroenterology disciplines.
Methods: A 28-member international interdisciplinary working group developed practical statements within the following domains: definition/terminology, initial diagnostic evaluation, reflux monitoring, therapeutic trials, behavioral factors and therapy, and risk stratification. Literature reviews guided statement development and were presented at virtual/in-person meetings. Each statement underwent 2 or more rounds of voting per the RAND Appropriateness Method; statements reaching appropriateness with ≥80% agreement are included as recommendations.
Results: The term laryngopharyngeal symptoms (LPS) applies to aerodigestive symptoms with potential to be induced by reflux and include cough, voice change, throat clearing, excess throat phlegm, and throat pain. Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) refers to patients with LPS and objective evidence of reflux. Importantly, the presence of LPS does not equate to LPRD. Laryngoscopy has value in assessing for nonreflux laryngopharyngeal processes, but laryngoscopic findings alone cannot diagnose LPRD. LPS patients should be categorized as with or without concurrent esophageal reflux symptoms. While lifestyle modification and empiric trials of acid suppression ± alginates are appropriate when esophageal reflux symptoms coexist, upper endoscopy and ambulatory reflux monitoring are required for LPRD diagnosis when symptoms persist, when LPS is isolated, or when management needs to be escalated to include invasive antireflux management. The two recommended ambulatory reflux monitoring modalities, 24-hour pH-impedance and 96-hour wireless pH monitoring, are not mutually exclusive with distinct roles for the evaluation of LPS. Laryngeal hyperresponsiveness and hypervigilance commonly contribute to both LPS and LPRD presentations and are responsive to laryngeal recalibration therapy and neuromodulators.
Discussion: The San Diego Consensus represents the formal modern-day interdisciplinary care paradigm to evaluate and manage LPS and LPRD.
Keywords: ambulatory reflux monitoring; gastroesophageal reflux disease; laryngopharyngeal reflux disease; laryngopharyngeal symptoms; laryngoscopy.
Copyright © 2025 by The American College of Gastroenterology.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest:
None to disclose: Marie Jette, Livia Guadagnoli, Mami Kaneko, Anne Vertigan, Chien-Lin Chen, Yinglian Xiao, Jerome R. Lechien, Julie Barkmeier-Kraemer, Daniel Cates, Gregory Dion, Stephanie Misono, Madeline Greytak
References
-
- Koufman JA, Aviv JE, Casiano RR, et al. Laryngopharyngeal reflux: position statement of the committee on speech, voice, and swallowing disorders of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;127:32–5. - PubMed
-
- Lechien JR, Akst LM, Hamdan AL, et al. Evaluation and Management of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: State of the Art Review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019;160:762–782. - PubMed
-
- Yadlapati R, Katzka DA. Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Is an Eternally Rolling Boulder. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;18:1431–1432. - PubMed
-
- Francis DO, Rymer JA, Slaughter JC, et al. High economic burden of caring for patients with suspected extraesophageal reflux. Am J Gastroenterol 2013;108:905–11. - PubMed
-
- Gong EJ, Choi KD, Jung HK, et al. Quality of life, patient satisfaction, and disease burden in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease with or without laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017;32:1336–1340. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources